The opening of these superchannels leads to a supercurrent quantization which exhibits a ... steps associated with the opening of transverse channels, ... gap in the banks). However, contrary to the universality of the quantization in a normal contac
Jul 29, 1999 - rent as the channel is switched on and off. The supercurrent I flowing through the junction splits into the two contributions from the discrete (Idis) ...
Sep 28, 1999 - in SNS junctions are transmitted by the correlated electron-hole ... In general, two effects have been studied in three terminal SNS devices.
Jan 28, 2010 - the normal wire leads to a highly non-sinusoidal current- phase relationship, in a good agreement with Ref. . We consider a diffusive normal ...
3 eãIã). , likely because the transport is mainly due to quasi- particles. But as the temperature decreases, the shot noise increases above this value. The evolution of the ... The contact pads are further covered by a low resistance. Ti-Au c
Mar 17, 2014 - metal electrode into one of the superconducting banks of the Josephson junction in the absence of a net ... Complex biased circuits can contain Josephson junctions in the resistive state, as well as .... Figure 2: (Color online) Curren
Jul 28, 2013 - to finite-voltage transport properties of mesoscopic Josephson junctions with high electron transparency. ... quantitative description of MAR in junctions with arbitrary electron transparency D  is based on the usual scattering ....
of the Hall voltage in SNS junctions has a form of narrow pulses with the Josephson ... Ïc = eH/mc is the cyclotron frequency; H is the magnetic field and eb the.
2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Appalachian State University, Boone, ... supercurrent mediated by quantum Hall (QH) edge states in boron nitride (BN).
Apr 18, 2007 - between theory an experiment, since in reality the mis- .... which accounts automatically for the normalization con- dition. ..... This means that it is reduced by approximately a factor 6, which is the same reduction factor obtained f
expected in superconducting tunnel and SNS junctions whose subgap conductivity ... lation numbers ne,h(E,x) of electrons and holes within the normal metal, 0 ...
Dec 20, 2010 - (Color online): Phase dependence of the admittance. Y in units of the .... The quasi- particle contribution is easiest to derive in a gauge where.
Dec 6, 2014 - h e e. 2e. Ð. -Ð. A(E). R(E). Figure 1. Multiple Andreev reflections in ... In diffusive SNS junctions, the electron-hole coherence in the normal ...
Jul 13, 2016 - StraÃe 3, 79104 Freiburg, Germany. Copyright line will be provided by the publisher. 1. arXiv:1607.03803v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 13 Jul 2016 ...
ÏÎ¦0 LIC(T, dF. Î¾F. ), where L is the loop inductance. Here we assume a sinu- soidal IS(Ï) for simplicity. For Î³ = 1 a phase transi- tion to a ground state with two ...
Jul 17, 2007 - the magnetic length Î¾H = pÎ¦0/H, where H is the magnetic field and ... as a funcion of a perpendicular magnetic field in ballistic SNS junctions of ...
superconductor (SNS) junction below the Thouless gap. We show that long-wave fluctuations of the concentration of impurities in the normal layer lead to the ...
Jun 10, 2010 - [The symmetric case with the equal resistances of the ..... cable when electron and hole distribution functions in the superconductors essentially ...
Oct 1, 2013 - film 's', a metallic ferromagnet 'F' and an insulating barrier 'I'. At temperatures close to ... are sandwich-type structures26â27. The characteristic ...
Mar 6, 2018 - University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom .... We hope the data in this present work can help inform interpretation of the ..... It is interesting to note, however, that to recover the highest IcRN observed in this.
Mar 13, 2018 - pattern) caused by real magnetic fields passing through the junction. The absence of oscillatory supercurrent originates from the fact that strain-induced gauge fields have opposite ... charged particle propagating over a path C will a
is applied to the subharmonic gap structure (SGS); simple analytical results are ... In the general case, the exact solution is found in terms of chain-fractions, and.
ties in anisotropic supercondutor junctions. So far, such formular for the Josephson current is obtained in SIS junctions of dx2ây2 superconductors10. However ...
arXiv:cond-mat/0003315v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 17 Mar 2000
SUPERCURRENT NOISE IN SNS JUNCTIONS D.V. AVERIN Department of Physics and Astronomy, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook NY 11794 Quasiclassical Green’s functions of a short superconductor/normal metal/superconductor (SNS) junction are calculated for multi-mode junction with arbitrary electron transmission properties. They provide the basis for description of all of the junction transport characteristics, and are used to calculate the equilibrium spectral density of supercurrent fluctuations.
The process of multiple Andreev reflections (MAR) is the dominant mechanism of electron transport in Josephson junctions with large electron transparency. One of the main qualitative features of MAR is the coherent transfer of charge by large quanta, the size of which increases with decreasing bias voltage V . At low bias voltages, eV ≪ ∆, where ∆ is the superconducting energy gap, this leads to strong increase of non-equilibrium current noise in the MAR regime, the fact that presently attracts interest to the noise properties of high-transparency junction both in theory 1,2,3 and experiment 4,5,6 . At V smaller than the quasiparticle energy relaxation rate γ, eV ≪ ¯hγ, the MAR-noise saturates and turns into equilibrium supercurrent noise that is best described in terms of the thermal fluctuations of the occupation factors of the Andreev states carrying supercurrent. Since the dynamics of these occupation factors is driven by inelastic transitions, comprehensive theory of the current noise in high-transparency junctions should be based on the Green’s functions formalism which provides a rigorous description of the inelastic processes. Until now, such a theory was developed only for the single-mode ballistic junctions 1 . The aim of this work is to calculate quasiclassical Green’s functions of a short multi-mode Josephson junction with arbitrary electron transmission properties. They are used then to derive the general expression for equilibrium supercurrent noise and to find this noise in disordered SNS junctions with diffusive electron transport. 2
Junction model and Green’s functions
The basic model of a short Josephson junction with large electron transparency is a constriction between two superconductors that supports N propagating electron modes. If the constriction length d is much smaller than the superconductor coherence length ξ, the only characteristic of the constriction relevant for electron transport is the elastic scattering matrix S: S=
r t t′ r ′
which is energy-independent in the relevant energy range set by the superconducting energy gap. Unitarity √ transmission and √ reflection matrices can be expressed as: √ of S implies√that the N × N t = u†1 Du2 , t′ = u†3 Du4 , r = u†1 Ru4 , r ′ = −u†3 Ru2 , where D is the diagonal matrix of N transmission probabilities, R = 1 − D, and uj are unitary matrices. Transport characteristics of such junctions can be expressed in terms of their quasiclassical Green’s functions. Calculation of these functions for the multi-mode junctions presented here follows closely similar calculation 7 in the single-mode case. The quasiclassical Green’s functions can be written as X ′ ′ G(z, z ′ ) = (E± e±ikF (z−z ) + F± e±ikF (z+z ) ) , (2) ±
where z, z ′ are the coordinates along the current flow, and kF is the Fermi momentum. The amplitudes E and F are slowly varying functions of coordinates in the junction electrodes and have matrix structure in the transverse mode space. Because of the electron scattering, they change rapidly in the junction region (z ≃ 0). Since the junction is short, d ≪ ξ, rapid variation of the amplitudes E and F across it can be described as the boundary condition relating them at z → −0 and z → +0. This condition is derived from the fact that in the junction region, G(z, z ′ ) satisfy regular Schr¨ odinger equation as a function of z and z ′ , and therefore can be expressed in terms of the products of the two scattering states, G(z, z ′ ) =
ψi (z)λij ψj (z ′ ) .
Here ψ1 is the solution of the Schr¨ odinger equation for particles incident from the left, ψi (z) =
eikF z + re−ikF z , z → −∞ , teikF z , z → ∞ ,
and ψ2 is similar solution for scattering from the right. Note that “infinity” in eq. (4) means | z |≫ d and still corresponds to z ≃ 0, i.e. | z |≪ ξ, on the length scale of variations of the amplitudes E and F in the electrodes that is given by the coherence length ξ. Comparison of expansion of G(z, z ′ ) obtained from eqs. (3), (4), and similar equation for ψ2 , in the region to the left of the junction with the expansion to the right establishes four relations between the amplitudes E and F in these two regions: t′† (F+ (+0) − E+ (+0)r ′ ) = (F+ (−0) − r † E− (−0))t ,
t E− (−0)t = E− (+0) + r E+ (+0)r − F− (+0)r − r F+ (+0) ,
t′† E+ (+0)t′ = E+ (−0) + r † E− (−0)r − F+ (−0)r − r † F− (−0) .
“Rotating” the amplitudes E and F by the unitary matrices uj we can bring all coefficients in eqs. (5) into the diagonal form in the transverse mode space. The equilibrium Green’s functions G1,2 deep inside first and second superconductors, which play the role of the source terms in equations defining the amplitudes, are proportional to unit matrix in this space. This means that the boundary conditions (5) become diagonal for the appropriately rotated amplitudes. In terms of the combinations of these amplitudes † † Q± 1 = (u4 F+ (−0)u1 ± u1 F− (−0)u4 ))/2 ,
P1− = (u4 E+ (−0)u†4 − u1 E− (−0)u†1 )/2 ,
P2− = (u3 E+ (+0)u†3 − u2 E− (+0)u†2 )/2 ,
† † Q± 2 = (u3 F+ (+0)u2 ± u2 F− (+0)u3 ))/2 ,
P1+ = (u4 E+ (−0)u†4 + u1 E− (−0)u†1 )/2 − G1 ,
P2+ = (u3 E+ (+0)u†3 + u2 E− (+0)u†2 )/2 − G2 ,
the boundary conditions (5) can be written as follows: √
Requirement that all deviations of the Green’s functions from the equilibrium homogeneous values G1,2 , that are represented by the non-vanishing amplitudes P and Q, decay away from the junction region (at z → ±∞) imposes another conditions on P and Q. This condition has the same form as in the single-mode case 7 : Gj Pj± = −Pj± Gj = (−1)j+1 Pj∓ ,
± j+1 ∓ Gj Q± Qj , j = Qj Gj = (−1)
j = 1, 2 .
Combined, eqs. (6) and (7) give a system of linear matrix equations for the amplitudes P and Q. Solving this system and using the normalization condition satisfied by the Green’s functions G1,2 , G21,2 = 1, 9 we get finally: √ (8) E+ = u†4 D(G1 + 1)G− G+ /Ku4 + G1 , F+ = u†4 R(G1 + 1)/Ku1 , √ E− = u†1 D(G1 − 1)G− G+ /Ku1 + G1 , F− = u†1 R(G1 − 1)/Ku4 , where G± = (G1 ± G2 )/2 and K = 1 − DG2− . The amplitudes E and F in eq. (8) are given in the first electrode (z → −0). Similar expressions can be obtained for the second electrode. Equations (8) solve the problem of electron transport in different types of junctions ranging from quantum point contacts with few propagating electron modes to short multi-mode SNS junctions with diffusive electron transport. They are valid for arbitrary ratio of the two values of the superconducting energy gap in the junctions electrodes, and can be applied, e.g., to symmetric SNS junctions with the same gap and NS junctions with vanishing gap in one of the electrodes. The amplitudes (8) define the Green’s functions (2) in the junction region and allow one to calculate different transport characteristics of the junction. For example, since the single-mode version of eqs. (8) was the starting point of the theory 8 of ac Josephson effect in high-transparency junctions, eqs. (8) prove that this theory can be extended automatically to the multi-mode junctions. Another application of eqs. (8) is presented in the next Section, where they are used to calculate equilibrium fluctuations of the supercurrent. 3
Equilibrium supercurrent noise
General expression for the current noise in terms of the quasiclassical Green’s functions is derived in 10 . In equilibrium, this equation reduces to the following result for the spectral density of current fluctuations 1 : SI (ω) =
where σz is the Pauli matrix, the trace is taken over the transverse mode space and over electronhole space, ρ(ǫ) ≡ E R (ǫ) − E A (ǫ), and ν(ǫ) ≡ F R (ǫ) − F A (ǫ). The functions with superscripts R, A denote retarded and advanced components of the Green’s functions. In what follows, the noise (9) is calculated for a symmetric junction between two identical superconductors which are close to “ideal” BCS superconductors: GR,A 1 (ε)
Here ϕ is the Josephson phase difference across the junction. Imaginary parts γ1,2 of ǫ, ∆ arise from inelastic scattering, for instance the electron-phonon scattering, and are assumed to be small, γ1,2 ≪ ǫ , ∆. The functions GR,A in the second electrode are given by the same expression 2 with ϕ → −ϕ. For superconductors described by the Green’s functions (10), the amplitudes (8) contain resonant denominators 1 − DG2− , the contribution from which dominates the noise at ˜ 2 sin(ϕ/2)/(∆ ˜ 2 − ǫ˜2 ), where ∆ ˜ = ∆ ± iγ2 low frequencies ω ≪ ∆/¯ h. Indeed, in this case G2− = ∆ 2 2 1/2 and ǫ˜ = ǫ ± iγ1 , and 1 − DG− nearly vanishes for ε ≃ εk ≡ ±∆[1 − Dk sin (ϕ/2)] . Then, ρ(ǫ), ν(ǫ) ∝
γk /2 , (ε ∓ εk )2 + γk2 /4
where γk = 2(γ1 (εk ) ∓ γ2 (εk )εk /∆). (Since γ1 (−ε) = γ1 (ε) and γ2 (−ε) = −γ2 (ε), the width γ of the resonance is the same for both resonances in eq. (11).) The two resonances correspond to the
two discrete Andreev states per mode with energies ±εk in the subgap region. Their broadening γ is caused by the inelastic transitions between these states and the continuum of states in the bulk electrodes. Expression for γ in the case of electron-phonon transitions is given, e.g., in 11 . Due to resonance (11), we can take all non-resonant terms out of the integral over ε in eq. (9). Evaluating the non-resonant terms at ε = ±εk and intergrating the resonant denominators we obtain the spectral density of current fluctuations at low frequencies ω ∼ γ: SI (ω) =
2 N Ik γk 1 X , 2π k=1 cosh(εk /2T ) ω 2 + γk2
where Ik = (e∆2 /2¯ h)Dk sin ϕ/εk is the contribution to the supercurrent from one of the Andreev states in the kth mode. Equation (12) determines the equilibrium noise of the supercurrent in short Josephson junctions. It has a simple interpretation in terms of the fluctuations of the occupation factors of Andreev states carrying the supercurrent. All states are occupied independently one from another. If a state with energy ±εk is occupied, it gives contribution ±Ik to the supercurrent; if it is empty, the contribution to the supercurrent is zero. These two situations are realized with the probabilities f (±εk ) and 1 − f (±εk ), respectively, and the transitions between them occur with the characteristic rate γ. Calculation of the spectral density of this simple classical stochastic process reproduces eq. (12). This equation was conjectured in 1 on the basis of the similar interpretation of the noise in the single-mode ballistic junctions. The calculation presented in this work provides its rigorous proof. At temperatures close to the superconducting critical temperature Tc of the junction electrodes, the energy gap is small, T ≫ ∆, and the transition rates γk and the occupation probabilities of Andreev states are independent of the state energy, and eq. (12) can be simplified further. In this high-temperature regime, one also has to take into account the non-resonant contribution to the current noise from the continuum part of the junction spectrum which can become comparable to the resonant contribution (12). As can be seen from eq. (9), this nonresonant contribution coincides at T ≫ ∆ with the regular equilibrium thermal noise of a normal junction. Combining the two contributions we obtain the noise in the high-temperature limit: 1 SI (ω) = 2π
γ + SN , ω2 + γ 2
where SN = GT /π and G = (e2 /π¯ h) N k=1 Dk is the junction conductance. Equation (13) can be evaluated if the junction has known distribution of transparencies. An important example is provided by the regular multi-mode disordered SNS junction with diffusive electron transport. This type of junctions is characterized by the quasicontinuous Dorokhov’s R P distribution of transparencies, k = (π¯hG/2e2 ) 01 dD/D(1 − D)1/2 . Calculating the integral over D we find spectral density of current noise at large temperatures: P
ϕ G∆2 cos2 SI (ω) = 2¯ h 2
γ ϕ −1 + SN , 2 sin ϕ ω + γ2
ϕ ∈ [−π, π] .
The phase dependence of the supercurrent-noise part of eq. (14) is plotted in Fig. 1. Equation (14) shows that if T ≪ ∆2 /¯ hγ, this noise gives the dominant contribution to the current noise at frequencies ω ∼ γ. The noise can also be larger than the average supercurrent I(ϕ) = (πG∆2 /4eT ) sin ϕ. If ∆/T < (e2 /¯hG)1/2 , typical r.m.s. of the supercurrent noise (in the frequency range γ) is larger than I(ϕ). This means that the supercurrent noise should qualitatively change the behavior of the SNS junctions at temperatures close to Tc and should also be observable at low temperatures.
0.3 0.2 0.1 0
Figure 1: Dependence of the zero-frequency spectral density S(0) = (SI (0) − SN )/(G∆2 /2¯ hγ) of the supercurrent noise in short disordered SNS junctions on the Josephson phase difference ϕ at large temperatures T ≫ ∆. All quantities are defined as in the eq. (14).
In conclusion, the equilibrium supercurrent noise has been studied in short Josephson junctions with arbitrary electron transmission properties. Characteristic qualitative features of the noise are its dependence on the Josephson phase difference across the junction, and the cutoff frequency determined by the relaxation rate, which can be much smaller than the temperature and superconducting energy gap. The r.m.s. of the noise is larger that the average supercurrent at temperatures close to the critical temperature of the junction electrodes. A formal result of this work is the general expression for the quasiclassical Green’s functions of the multi-mode junctions that can be used to study other transport characteristics, for instance, the non-equilibrium noise in the MAR regime. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by ONR grant # N00014-95-1-0762 and by the U.S. Civilian Research and Development Foundation under Award No. RP1-165. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
D.V. Averin and H.T. Imam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3814 (1996). J.C. Cuevas, A. Martin-Rodero, and A. Levy Yeyati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4086 (1999). Y. Naveh and D.V. Averin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4090 (1999). P. Dieleman, H.G. Bukkems, T.M. Klapwijk, M. Schicke, and K.H. Gundlach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3486 (1997). T. Hoss, C. Strunk, T. Nussbaumer, R. Huber, U. Staufer, C. Schonenberger, condmat/9901129. X. Jehl, P. Payet-Burin, C. Baraduc, R. Calemczuk and M. Sanquer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1660 (1999). A. Zaitzev, Sov. Phys. - JETP 59, 1015 (1984). A. Zaitzev and D.V. Averin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3602 (1998). A.I. Larkin and Yu.N. Ovchinnikov, Sov. Phys. - JETP 41, 960 (1976). V.A. Khlus, Sov. Phys. - JETP 66, 1243 (1987).
11. D.V. Averin and A. Bardas, Phys. Rev. B 53, R1705 (1996).