Dec 3, 2007 - 2Department of Physics & Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA. 3Theoretische Physik III, Elektronische ..... essentially the same result, which we call Ïloc,static. A key observation is that Ïloc,static is larger than Ï
URUGUAY. Â§ Grupo de Materiais e Dispositivos-CMDMC, Departamento de FÃsica e Engenharia. FÃsica, UFSCar, Caixa Postal 676, 13565-905, SÃ£o Carlos SP, BRAZIL. Â¥ Instituto de FÃsica "Gleb Wataghin", UNICAMP, 13083-970, Campinas SP, BRAZIL. â¡ Lab
Jun 10, 2010 - tunneling microscopy (STM) and the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD), made it possible to study magnetic properties of single adsorbed atoms on various surfaces. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...... impurity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:2893, 1998.
1 Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Institute of Solid State Physics, and High Magnetic Field. Laboratory, Chinese ... boron or Nitrogen; M, transition metal) have displayed lots of interesting properties, such as ... peaks can be indexed by the a
Sep 6, 2017 - direct band gap of 1.76 eV at K point with SOC of 147 meV . d) Spin-polarized density of states of pristine SL MoS2. Different fabrication ... The point group of MoS2 with MoS defect is C3v and it remains preserved after .... Schematic
Stoner-Wohlfarth model. The four-fold symmetry of the magnetic anisotropy becomes more evident by plotting the angular dependent remanence and critical ...
1 Experimental Physics V, Center for Electronic Correlations and Magnetism, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany. 2 School of ... contact-free dielectric constants at mm-wavelengths, as well as ferroelectric polarization are reported for s
neutron powder diffraction data are consistent with the appearance of an inclined circular helix with propagation vector ki = (Â½ Â½ Â½ Â± q). 21 . Interestingly, the deviation from collinearity in the spiral state occurs exclusively within the bow-t
motivated directly by Resonating Valence Bond (RVB) ideas4, slave-Fermion mean field theories5 and large .... where the subtraction of 3 was included for convenience. In an eigenbasis of Sz i = S = Â±1/2, the Hamiltonian ... t âª U. Indeed, in the l
Sep 16, 2009 - ulation amplitude is resonantly enhanced at Ïrf = ÏL and the phase âÏ between the drive and the response obeys ... A custom-made hologram splits the beam from the frequency-stabilized laser into ... as common drive frequency Ïcom
3Instituto de QuÃmica â Universidade de SÃ£o Paulo, SÃ£o Paulo, Brazil. 4Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de AragÃ³n-CSIC, University of Zaragoza, Spain. We have ..... partially from Diputacion General de Aragon and Ministry of. Education, Spain
microscope and software from Nanotech.36 These modes rely on the imaging advantages of. AFM to simultaneously ... grant RYC-2010-06365. X.M. acknowledges the Grant Agency of the Czech .... S. J. Moon, H. Jin, W. S. Choi, J. S. Lee, S. S. A. Seo, J. Y
Feb 1, 2008 - Calculations have been performed on the T3E Cray computer at CINECA, Bologna. 4. Page 5. REFERENCES.  C. Milani, C. Giambelli, H.E. Roman, F. Alasia, G. Benedek, R.A. Broglia, S. San- guinetti and Y. Yabana, Chem. Phys. Lett. 258 (19
Chapter 3 gives an overview of superconducting materials. The next chapter,. Chapter 4, presents the main principles of superconductivity as a phenomenon, ...... The answer is yes. For example, atomic nuclei are composed of protons and neutrons (whic
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org .... S. J. Moon, H. Jin, W. S. Choi, J. S. Lee, S. S. A. Seo, J. Yu, G. Cao, T. W. Noh ...
We present a systematic study of core-shell Au/Fe3O4 nanoparticles produced by thermal decomposition under mild conditions. The morphology and crystal structure of the nanoparticles revealed the presence of Au core of ã ã = (6.9Â±1.0) nm surroun
(STXM) to confirm these predictions experimentally. Figure 2A shows STXM images of the domain structure in a 2 Î¼m diameter Pt/Co/Ta disk during minor loop cycling of Bz. The left panel shows a parallel stripe phase at Bz = -6 mT, which transforms in
May 23, 2014 - pensive platform for optical quantum memories is the cornerstone of many future quantum technologies ... quantum computing [5, 6], and creating quantum re- peater stations that overcome the current .....  H. G. Berry, G. Gabrielse
Abstract. The origin of room temperature (RT) ferromagnetism (FM) in Zn1-xNixO (0
Numerous authors have referred to room-temperature magnetic switching of large electric polarizations as âThe Holy Grailâ of ..... ruled out by the independence of the polarization data upon the sign of applied field H. Eq.1b arises from an E. 2.
Jan 9, 2017 - arXiv:1603.01255v3 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 9 Jan 2017. Room-temperature magnetic ... Fermi surfaces arise from crossings between conduction and valence bands, which cannot be avoided due to .... energy and momentum space locations of the We
Room Temperature Magnetic Order in Air-Stable Ultra-Thin Iron Oxide. Jiangtan Yuan1#, Andrew Balk2#, Hua Guo1, Sahil Patel1, Xuanhan Zhao3, Qiyi Fang1, ...
atom, allows identification of the key processes that underlie gas-induced mass transport. Page 2. 2. Gas-enhanced mass transport at surfaces is particularly important in heterogeneous catalysis, where the growth ... isolated Au adatoms (minimum sepa
Feb 28, 2018 - sharp increase in magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant from .... and (e); 5 nm-thick CoO grown on Fe3O4 (40 nm)/MgO (001) (c) and (f).
Room Temperature In-plane h100i Magnetic Easy Axis for Fe3 O4 /SrTiO3 (001):Nb Grown by Infrared PLD Matteo Monti,1 Mikel Sanz,1 Mohamed Oujja,1 Esther Rebollar,1 Marta Castillejo,1 Francisco J. Pedrosa,2 Alberto Bollero,2 Julio Camarero,2, 3 Jose Luis F. Cu˜nado,2, 3 Norbert M. Nemes,4 Federico J. Mompean,5 Mar Garcia-Hern´andez,5 Shu Nie,6 Kevin F. McCarty,6 Alpha T. N’Diaye,7 Gong Chen,7 Andreas K. Schmid,7 Jos´e F. Marco,1 and Juan de la Figuera1 1
arXiv:1307.6873v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 25 Jul 2013
Instituto de Qu´ımica F´ısica “Rocasolano”, CSIC, Madrid E-28006, Spain IMDEA Nanociencia, Instituto Madrile˜no de Estudios Avanzados en Nanociencia, Madrid E-28049, Spain 3 Universidad Aut´onoma de Madrid 4 Dpto. de F´ısica Aplicada III, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid E-28040, Spain 5 Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, CSIC, Madrid E-28049, Spain 6 Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550, USA 7 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
We examine the magnetic easy-axis directions of stoichiometric magnetite films grown on SrTiO3 :Nb by infrared pulsed-laser deposition. Spin-polarized low-energy electron microscopy reveals that the individual magnetic domains are magnetized along the in-plane h100i film directions. Magneto-optical Kerr effect measurements show that the maxima of the remanence and coercivity are also along in-plane h100i film directions. This easy-axis orientation differs from bulk magnetite and films prepared by other techniques, establishing that the magnetic anisotropy can be tuned by film growth.
Magnetite (Fe3 O4 ), a ferrimagnet, is the oldest magnetic material known. It is a highly correlated electron material that presents a prototypical metal-insulator transition close to 120 K (the Verwey transition[3, 4]). At low temperature it becomes ferroelectric, and thus, multiferroic[5, 6]. A bad metal at room temperature (RT), but predicted to be a half-metal with only the minority-spin band crossing the Fermi level, it has been considered a promising material for spintronic applications as an spin-injector or as part of a spin-valve. For such purposes, it is often desired to obtain highly perfect magnetite films on different oxide substrates. In particular, SrTiO3 is a very attractive material in the microelectronics industry and can be doped to provide either an insulating or metallic substrate. In consequence, there is interest in the magnetic and transport properties of magnetite films grown on SrTiO3 , both Nb-doped[10–14] and undoped[15–21], by using techniques such as molecular beam epitaxy or pulsed-laser deposition (PLD). The magnetization bulk easy-axis directions of Fe3 O4 at RT are the cubic h111i ones. The first order anisotropy constant changes sign upon cooling to 130 K, temperature below which the easy axis are the h100i directions[22–24], down to Verwey transition at ∼120 K where the structure changes from cubic to monoclinic. Thus, in the (001) surface of bulk samples the magnetization is expected to lie along the projection of the bulk h111i on the (001) surface, i.e., the in-plane h110i directions, an expectation confirmed by spin-polarized low-energy electron microscopy observations (SPLEEM). Most magnetic studies of thin films on SrTiO3 are performed by techniques such as magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE), and SQUID or vibrating-sample magnetometry (VSM), all of which average over the full thickness of the magnetite film[14, 15, 17, 18, 21]. In most cases, h110i in-plane directions are reported for the easy-axis[15, 27, 28], although some works indicate in-plane isotropic films. There are several reports of real-space imaging of the surface domains by magnetic-force microscopy (MFM)[14, 17, 21], showing
domains of about 60–100 nm in size, similar to the observed grain size, but they do not identify the local domain magnetization direction. On other (100) substrates, h110i easy-axis directions are also usually reported. Although attempts have been made to modify the easy axis orientation by the use of piezoelectric substrates or through growth on stepped substrates, to our knowledge no four-fold h100i magnetization axis have been obtained in magnetite films. In this work we report on the growth by infrared pulsedlaser deposition (PLD) of highly perfect magnetite films on SrTiO3 :Nb and their characterization by a variety of techniques. The films present robust in-plane four-fold easy axes at RT but, in contrast with precedent results, they are oriented along the h100i directions as detected locally by SPLEEM and averaged by MOKE. As for many complex oxides, one of the preferred growth methods for magnetite on SrTiO3 has been PLD. In contrast to previous reported work using ultraviolet light, we have grown magnetite films by infrared PLD at 1064 nm using a hematite target. The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser had a full width at half-maximum of 15 ns with a 10 Hz repetition rate at a typical fluence of 4 J/cm2 . SrTiO3 (100) substrates doped with 0.1% Nb from Crystek were heated to 780 K during deposition. Data reported in this work is from films 160 nm thick, although similar results have been obtained in 50 nm thick ones. The epitaxial relationship between the perovskite substrate and the spinel film is expected to be cube-on-cube, Fe3 O4 k SrT iO3 , and Fe3 O4 k SrT iO3 depicted in Figure 1(a). The low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) pattern for SrTiO3 :Nb (after annealing the substrate in 10−6 Torr of O2 at 800 K for several hours) is shown in Figure 1(b). The surface showed parallel steps ∼ 100 nm apart in LEEM and AFM (not shown). The magnetite LEED pattern measured after several cycles of cleaning by Ar+ sputtering and annealing in 10−6 Torr O2 , typical for preparing a clean magnetite surface in ultra-high vacuum, is shown in Fig-
FIG. 1. (a) Epitaxial relationship of magnetite on SrTiO3 . Oxygen atoms are shown as red spheres, with Sr atoms represented by green ones (Ti atoms are below in the middle of the blue-grey octahedra). The magnetite unit cell is shown in the upper-right side, with octahedral irons shown in yellow, and tetrahedral irons shown as green filled tetrahedra (schematics prepared by VESTA). The surface unit cells of both materials are drawn by blue squares. (b) LEED pattern of SrTiO3 :Nb. (c) LEED pattern of the magnetite film grown on SrTiO3 :Nb by PLD. The LEED patterns have been acquired in LEEM at electron energies of 30 and 24 eV respectively (we note that in LEEM the area sampled in reciprocal space does not change with electron energy so both images are at the same scale). (d) ICEMS M¨ossbauer spectra. (e) AFM image, 2 µm wide. The thermal color height scale corresponds to 40 nm. (f) STM image acquired with It =0.7 nA and Vbias =1 V. The image is 200 nm wide, and 10 nm high. (g) STM image acquired with It =0.5 nA and Vbias =1.1 V. The image is 41 nm wide, and shows the rows of atoms with different orientation in consecutive terraces.
ure 1(c). The strongest spots correspond to the first order and second order unit vectors of the surface primitive cell, which is rotated by 45◦ relative to the fcc cubic-cell unit vectors. The additional diffracted beams correspond to the c(2 × 2) reconstruction of magnetite[34, 35]. Thus, the LEED pattern confirms the cube-of-cube epitaxial relationship, and it further shows that the film is monocrystalline. The films have been characterized by integral conversion electron M¨ossbauer spectroscopy (ICEMS), x-ray diffraction (XRD), x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and SQUID magnetometry. In an ICEMS RT spectrum of stoichiometric magnetite, two sextet components are detected corresponding to iron in the octahedral and tetrahedral positions, respectively. In such spectrum the component corresponding to octahedral iron presents parameters intermediate of those of Fe2+ and Fe3+ . The magnetite film spectrum
shown in Figure 1(d) has been fitted with two components that have the expected values for magnetite, in isomer shift (0.23 mm/s and 0.69 mm/s), quadrupole shift (-0.04 mm/s and 0.01 mm/s) and hyperfine magnetic fields (49.0 T and 46.4 T). The ratio of the two components is 1.8–1.9 depending on the particular sample indicating that the film is of stoichiometric composition. The out-of-plane lattice spacing from XRD is 0.840 nm, indicating that the magnetite film is mostly relaxed. This is expected given the 7.5% mismatch between magnetite and SrTiO3 . Our films thickness (50-160 nm) is well above the limit for pseudomorhic growth as detected by TEM[16, 21]. No contamination was detected by XPS, which showed only Fe and O, the former corresponding to a typical magnetite spectra with a mixture of Fe2+ and Fe3+ . The Verwey temperature was measured to be 114 K with a SQUID magnetometer. Typical microscopy images of the films are presented in Figure 1(e–g). AFM images of the surface show square features (“mesas”), with heights of up to 30 nm and lateral sizes in the 100-200 nm range, emerging from a flat film, as shown in Figure 1(e). In STM, both the areas between the mesas and their tops are confirmed to be quite flat, with small terraces tens of nanometers wide separated by atomic steps [0.21 nm high, see Figure 1(f) where the contrast has been enhanced so individual steps can be located]. While the orientation of the atomic steps, both on top of the mesas and on the areas between them, is not well defined, the mesas themselves are remarkably well aligned with the in-plane h110i directions. On the individual atomic terraces, atomic rows 0.6 nm apart run along the  direction in one terrace, and along the [1¯ 10] direction of the next atomic terrace [Figure 1(g)]. These rows correspond to the octahedral rows of iron of the magnetite unit cell, see Figure 1(a). Along the rows there is also an additional 0.6 nm periodicity, out-of-phase between consecutive rows. These periodicities corresponds to the c(2 × 2) reconstruction observed by LEED shown in Figure 1(c). This reconstruction, typical of magnetite cleaned by cycles of Ar+ sputtering and annealing in vacuum, has been interpreted as a Jahn-Teller distortion of the topmost octahedral iron atom positions along the rows of the surface. Cleaning the sample for ultra-high vacuum experiments (i.e., for the STM and LEEM observations), which involve mild sputtering and annealing, changes slightly the as-grown surface morphology. While it is obvious that individual atomic step positions are changed, we remark that the AFM measurements were done on the “as-grown” films. The agreement between the STM, LEEM and AFM results indicates that no large morphological changes have occurred during UHV cleaning. We have imaged the magnetic domains by means of SPLEEM. After cleaning the samples with Ar+ sputtering and annealing, the film was heated above the Curie temperature and slowly cooled back to RT. A low-energy electron micrograph of the film is shown in Figure 2(a). Faint squares are observed, which correspond to the mesas detected in the AFM and STM images in Figure 1. The squares are oriented along in-plane h110i providing an internal direction reference. The two magnetic contrast images are ob-
FIG. 2. (a) RT LEEM image of a magnetite film on SrTiO3 :Nb. (b,c) SPLEEM images acquired at the same location as (a) with the electron spin-direction along the x-axis ( direction) and y axis ([0¯ 10]) direction respectively showing the local surface magnetization component along the given direction. The LEEM start voltage for all the images is 6.8 V. The images are 9.1 µm wide. (d) Polar histogram of the in-plane magnetization as deduced from the images shown in (b,c).
tained by calculating the pixel-by-pixel asymmetry between LEEM images acquired illuminating the sample with beams of electrons with opposite spin polarization: bright (dark) areas indicate that the local surface magnetization has a component parallel (anti-parallel) to the spin-polarization direction of the electron beam. Grey areas indicate the absence of a magnetization component along the spin-polarization direction. The SPLEEM images thus indicate the local surface magnetization along a given direction. We note that SPLEEM is extremely surface sensitive, detecting the magnetization of the topmost atomic layers of the film. As the electron beam spin-polarization can be changed with respect to the sample, the magnetization vector can be determined in real space with nanometer resolution. More details on the SPLEEM instrument, the spin-polarization control method or the vector magnetometric application of SPLEEM can be found in the literature[39, 42, 43]. SPLEEM images acquired (not shown) with out-of-plane spin direction presented negligible contrast, indicating that the magnetization lies mostly within the film plane. In Figures 2(b) and (c) white, black and grey regions are easily resolved. As the domains are not very large, it is difficult to determine by visual inspection whether the magnetization lies along some preferred axis. A plot of the magnetization-vector histogram vs. angle is shown in Figure 2(d) obtained by combining the images pixel by pixel to calculate the in-plane magnetization
FIG. 3. (a) RT hysteresis cycles acquired at αH = 0◦ ( direction) and at αH = 45◦ ( direction). (b) Angular evolution of the remanence, MR , with corresponding polar-plot representation (right-hand side). (c) Angular evolution of the coercivity, HC , with corresponding polar-plot representation (right).
vector. It indicates that the magnetization lies mostly along the four in-plane h100i directions, i.e. the histogram shows peaks at angles corresponding to the , , [¯ 100] and [0¯10] orientations. The domain walls also show a preferred orientation, but along  and [1¯10] directions, i.e. along the sides of the 3D mesas on the film. The domains are up to one micrometer in size. The unexpected magnetization easy-axis orientation of the film is confirmed by angular-dependent averaged magnetometry measurements. MOKE hysteresis loops have been systematically recorded by changing the in-plane orientation of the applied magnetic field in the angular range αH = 0–360◦ (Figure 3). Two representative plots (αH = 0◦ and 45◦ ) are shown in Figure 3(a). The film coercivity is 45–50 mT, in line with published values for magnetite on SrTiO3 [14, 17, 18]. The low saturation fields around 150 mT evidence the high structural quality of our films, although often much higher saturation fields are reported for magnetite films on 100 substrates, probably due to magnetic domain pinning at defects. Hysteresis loops displayed in Figure 3(a) show different remanence and coercivity values as a function of the in-plane orientation of the applied magnetic field. In particular, larger remanence and coercivity values are found for αH = 0◦ , i.e., along the  direction. Moreover, The angular dependence of the remanence [Figure 3(b)] and the coercivity [Figure 3(c)] show the fourfold symmetry of the magnetic anisotropy with
4 the highest values found at 0, 90, 180 and 270◦ . The fourfold symmetry can be easily identified in the corresponding polar plots of the remanence and the coercivity [right-hand side of Figures 3(b) and (c)]. As the maxima of both remanence and coercivity correspond to to easy-axis directions, the angular MOKE indicates that for the full film the easy-axes are the in-plane h100i directions, in agreement with the microscopic SPLEEM observations of the surface magnetization. In summary, we have grown pure stoichiometric magnetite films on SrTiO3 :Nb by infrared PLD. Unlike films reported to date, these films have a robust well defined easy-axis along the in-plane h100i directions. The individual magnetic domains at the surface of the films have been imaged in remanence by SPLEEM. The magnetic domains present magnetization vectors along the in-plane h100i directions, while the domain walls are aligned with the in-plane h110i directions. Hysteresis cycles have been measured by MOKE, obtaining the angular dependence of remanence and coercivity which both have maxima at the h100i directions and thus confirm the local determination of the easy-axis directions by an averaging technique. Our films prove that modifying the growth parameters in magnetite films allows tunning the easy-axis directions.
CTQ2010-15680, MAT2009-14578-C03-01 (MICINN), MAT2012-38045-C04-01 (MINECO), MAT2011-27470C02-02 (MICINN), MAT2011-25598 (MINECO), the EU-FP7 NANOPYME Project (No. 310516) and by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials and Engineering Sciences, U. S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC04-94AL85000 (Sandia National Laboratories). Experiments performed at the National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, were supported by the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Scientific User Facilities Division, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC0205CH11231. E.R, M.O., M.S., A.T.N. and M.M. gratefully thank financial support from the Ram´on y Cajal Programme (MINECO), a CSIC contract, a Geomateriales (CAM, S2009/Mat-1629) contract, a Feodor Lynen Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and a contract through the MICINN FPI Programme, respectively. We are grateful to Prof. T. Ezquerra (IEM, CSIC) for the use of the AFM system and M. Juanco (ICA, CSIC) for XRD measurements.
Authors acknowledge fruitful discussions with Prof. M. Ziese. This research was supported by Projects
 R. M. Cornell and U. Schwertmann, The Iron Oxides (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1997) p. 604.  A. A. Mills, Ann. Sci. 61, 273 (2004).  F. Walz, J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 14, R285 (2002).  J. Garc´ıa and G. Sub´ıas, J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 16, R145 (2004).  K. Kato and S. Iida, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 51, 1335 (1982).  M. Alexe, M. Ziese, D. Hesse, P. Esquinazi, K. Yamauchi, T. Fukushima, S. Picozzi, and U. G¨osele, Adv. Mat. 21, 4452 (2009).  M. I. Katsnelson, V. Y. Irkhin, L. Chioncel, A. I. Lichtenstein, and R. A. de Groot, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 315 (2008).  E. Wada, K. Watanabe, Y. Shirahata, M. Itoh, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Taniyama, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 102510 (2010).  M. Bibes, J. E. Villegas, and A. Barth´el´emy, Adv. Phys. 60, 5 (2011).  B. Carvello and L. Ranno, J. Mag. Magn. Mat. 272-276, 1926 (2004).  M. Ziese, U. Khler, A. Bollero, R. Hhne, and P. Esquinazi, Phys. Rev. B 71, 180406 (2005).  D. C. Kundaliya, S. B. Ogale, L. F. Fu, S. J. Welz, J. S. Higgins, G. Langham, S. Dhar, N. D. Browning, and T. Venkatesan, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 08K304 (2006).  I. Satoh, J. Takaobushi, H. Tanaka, and T. Kawai, Sol. Stat. Comm. 147, 397 (2008).  A. D. Wei, J. R. Sun, Y. Z. Chen, W. M. Lue, and B. G. Shen, J. Phys. D-App. Phys. 43, 205004 (2010).  S. Kale, S. M. Bhagat, S. E. Lofland, T. Scabarozi, S. B. Ogale, A. Orozco, S. R. Shinde, T. Venkatesan, B. Hannoyer, B. Mer-
cey, and W. Prellier, Phys. Rev. B 64, 205413 (2001).  J. G. Zheng, G. E. Sterbinsky, J. Cheng, and B. W. Wessels, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 25, 1520 (2007).  Y. Z. Chen, J. R. Sun, Y. N. Han, X. Y. Xie, J. Shen, C. B. Rong, S. L. He, and B. G. Shen, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 07D703 (2008).  J. Cheng, G. Sterbinsky, and B. Wessels, J. Cryst. Growth 310, 3730 (2008).  D. Lee and G. Chern, Sol. Stat. Comm. 148, 353 (2008).  G. Leung, M. Vickers, R. Yu, and M. Blamire, J. Cryst. Growth 310, 5282 (2008).  A. Hamie, Y. Dumont, E. Popova, A. Fouchet, B. WarotFonrose, C. Gatel, E. Chikoidze, J. Scola, B. Berini, and N. Keller, Thin Sol. Films 525, 115 (2012).  L. R. Bickford, Phys. Rev. 78, 449 (1950).  K. Abe, Y. Miyamoto, and S. Chikazumi, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 41, 1894 (1976).  M. Jackson, J. Bowles, and S. Banerjee, IRM Quaterly 21, 2 (2011).  W. Williams and T. M. Wright, J. Geophys. Res. 103, PP. 30,537 (1998).  J. de la Figuera, L. Vergara, A. T. N’Diaye, A. Quesada, and A. K. Schmid, Ultramicroscopy (2013), 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.02.020, arXiv:1301.4350 [cond-mat].  A. Brandlmaier, S. Geprgs, M. Weiler, A. Boger, M. Opel, H. Huebl, C. Bihler, M. S. Brandt, B. Botters, D. Grundler, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, Phys. Rev. B 77, 104445 (2008).
5  M. Fonin, C. Hartung, U. Rudiger, D. Backes, L. Heyderman, F. Nolting, A. F. Rodriguez, and M. Klaui, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 07D315 (2011).  P. van der Heijden, M. van Opstal, C. Swste, P. Bloemen, J. Gaines, and W. de Jonge, J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 182, 71 (1998).  L. McGuigan, R. C. Barklie, R. G. S. Sofin, S. K. Arora, and I. V. Shvets, Phys. Rev. B 77 (2008), 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.174424, WOS:000256763800078.  K. Momma and F. Izumi, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).  M. Sanz, M. Oujja, E. Rebollar, J. F. Marco, J. de la Figuera, M. Monti, A. Bollero, J. Camarero, F. J. Pedrosa, M. Garc´ıaHern´andez, and M. Castillejo, Appl. Surf. Sci. (2013), 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.026.  J.-B. Moussy, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46, 143001 (2013).  G. S. Parkinson, Z. Novotn´y, P. Jacobson, M. Schmid, and U. Diebold, Surf. Sci. 605, L42 (2011).  R. Pentcheva, W. Moritz, J. Rundgren, S. Frank, D. Schrupp, and M. Scheffler, Surf. Sci. 602, 1299 (2008).  R. Vandenberghe, C. A. Barrero, G. M. da Costa, E. Van San, and E. De Grave, Hyperfine Interactions 126, 247 (2000).
 T. Fujii, F. M. F. de Groot, G. A. Sawatzky, F. C. Voogt, T. Hibma, and K. Okada, Phys. Rev. B 59, 3195 (1999).  N. Rougemaille and A. K. Schmid, Eur. Phys. J. App. Phys. 50, 20101 (2010).  R. Ramchal, A. K. Schmid, M. Farle, and H. Poppa, Phys. Rev. B 69, 214401 (2004).  K. Grzelakowski, T. Duden, E. Bauer, H. Poppa, and S. Chiang, IEEE Trans. Mag. 30, 4500 (1994).  T. Duden and E. Bauer, Rev. Sci. Inst. 66, 2861 (1995).  F. El Gabaly, S. Gallego, M. C. Mu˜noz, L. Szunyogh, P. Weinberger, C. Klein, A. K. Schmid, K. F. McCarty, and J. de la Figuera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 147202 (2006).  F. El Gabaly, K. F. McCarty, A. K. Schmid, J. de la Figuera, M. C. Mu˜noz, L. Szunyogh, P. Weinberger, and S. Gallego, New J. Phys. 10, 073024 (2008).  D. T. Margulies, F. T. Parker, M. L. Rudee, F. E. Spada, J. N. Chapman, P. R. Aitchison, and A. E. Berkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5162 (1997).