Rare K Decays: Results and Prospects Laurence Littenberg
arXiv:hep-ex/0201026v1 17 Jan 2002
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 Abstract. Recent results on rare kaon decays are reviewed and prospects for future experiments are discussed.
INTRODUCTION In recent years the study of the rare decays of kaons has had three primary motivations. The first is the search for physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). Virtually all attempts to redress the theoretical shortcomings of the Standard Model (SM) predict some degree of lepton flavor violation (LFV). Decays such as KL → µ± e∓ have very good experimental signatures and can consequently be pursued to remarkable sensitivities. These sensitivities correspond to extremely high energy scales in models where the only suppression is that of the mass of the exchanged field. There are also theories that predict new particles created in kaon decay or the violation of symmetries other than lepton flavor. The second is the potential of decays that are allowed but that are extremely suppressed in the SM. In several of these, the leading component is a G.I.M.-suppressed one-loop process that is quite sensitive to fundamental SM parameters such as Vtd . These decays are also potentially very sensitive to BSM physics. Finally there are a number of long-distance-dominated decays which can test theoretical techniques such as chiral Lagrangians that purport to explain the low-energy behavior of QCD. Knowledge of some of these decays is also needed to extract more fundamental information from certain of the one-loop processes. This field is quite active as indicated by Table 1 that lists the decays for which results have been forthcoming in the last couple of years as well as those that are under analysis. Thus in a short review such as this, one must be quite selective.
BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL There were several K decay experiments dedicated to lepton flavor violation at the Brookhaven AGS during the 1990’s. These advanced the sensitivity to such processes by many orders of magnitude. In addition, several “by-product” results on LFV and other BSM topics have emerged from the other kaon decay experiments of this period. Table 2 summarizes the status of work on BSM probes in kaon decay.
TABLE 1. K+ K+
Rare K decay modes under recent or on-going study.
→ π+ νν¯
→ π+ µ+ µ−
K + → π+ π0 νν¯ KL → π0 e+ e− γ KL → π+ π− e+ e− K + → e+ νµ+ µ− KL → e± e∓ µ± µ∓ K + → π + µ + e− K + → π − e+ e+ K + → π+ γ
TABLE 2. Current 90% CL limits on K decay modes violating the SM. The violation codes are “LF” for lepton flavor, “LN” for lepton number, “G” for generation number, , “H” for helicity, “N” requires new particle Process
KL → µe → π + µ + e− + K → π + µ − e+ KL → π0 µe + K → π − e+ e+ K + → π− µ+ µ+ K + → π − µ + e+ KL → µ± µ± e∓ e∓ K + → π+ f 0 K + → π+ γ
LF LF LF, G LF LN, G LN, G LF, LN, G LF, LN, G N H
It is clear from this table that any deviation from the SM must be highly suppressed. The LFV probes in particular have become the victims of their own success. The specific theories they were designed to test have been killed or at least forced to retreat to the point where meaningful tests in the kaon system would be very difficult. Both kaon flux and rejection of background are becoming problematical. Analysis of data already collected is continuing but no new kaon experiments focussed on LFV are being planned. Interest in probing LFV has migrated to the muon sector.
ONE LOOP DECAYS In the kaon sector experimental effort has shifted from LFV to “one-loop” decays. These are GIM-suppressed decays in which loops containing weak bosons and heavy quarks dominate or at least contribute measurably to the rate. These processes include KL → π0 νν¯ , K + → π+ νν¯ , KL → µ+ µ− , KL → π0 e+ e− and KL → π0 µ+ µ− . In some cases the one-loop contributions violate CP. In one, KL → π0 νν¯ , this contribution completely dominates the decay. Since the GIM-mechanism tends to enhance the contribution of heavy quarks in the loops, in the SM these decays are sensitive to the product of cou-
FIGURE 1. K decays and the unitarity plane. The usual unitarity triangle is dashed. The triangle that can be constructed from rare K decays is solid. See text for further details.
plings Vts∗Vtd , often abbreviated as λt . Although one can readily analyze these decays in terms of the real and imaginary parts of λt , for comparison with results in the B system, it is conventional to parameterize them in terms of the Wolfenstein variables, A, ρ, and η. Fig. 1 shows the relationship of rare kaon decays to the unitarity triangle construc∗ V + V ∗ V + V ∗ V = 0, tion. The dashed triangle is the usual one derived from Vub ud cb cd tb td whereas the solid triangle illustrates the information available from rare kaon decays. Note that the “unitarity point” at the apex, (ρ, η), can be determined from either triangle, and disagreement between the K and B determinations implies physics beyond the SM. In Fig. 1 the branching ratio closest to each side of the triangle determines the length of that side. The arrows leading outward from those branching ratios point to processes that need to be studied either because they potentially constitute backgrounds, or because knowledge of them is required to relate the innermost branching ratios to fundamental parameters. KL → µ+ µ− , which can determine the bottom of the triangle (ρ), is the process for which the experimental data is the best, but for which the theory is most problematical. KL → π0 νν¯ , which determines the height of the triangle is theoretically the cleanest, but experiment is many orders of magnitude short of the SMpredicted level. K + → π+νν¯ , which determines the hypotenuse, is nearly as clean as KL → π0 νν¯ and has been observed. Prospects for K + → π+ νν¯ are probably the best of the three since it is already clear it can be exploited.
KL → µ+ µ− The short distance component of this decay can be quite reliably calculated in the SM. The most recent measurement of its branching ratio based on some 6200 events gave B(KL → µ+ µ− ) = (7.18 ± 0.17) × 10−9. However KL → µ+ µ− is dominated by long distance effects, the largest of which, the absorptive contribution mediated by
Components of the calculation of
+ − Babs γγ (KL →µ µ ) . B(KL →π+ π− )
KL → γγ, accounts for (7.07 ± 0.18) × 10−9. Subtracting the two, yields a 90% CL upper limit on the total dispersive part of B(KL → µ+ µ− ) of 0.37 × 10−9 . One can do a little better than this in the following way. The actual quantity measured in Ref  was B(KL →µ+ µ− ) −6 One wants to subtract from this measured quantity B(KL →π+ π− ) = (3.48 ± 0.05) × 10 the ratio
+ − Babs γγ (KL →µ µ ) + B(KL →π π− ) .
Fig 2 shows the components of this latter ratio, obtained from
Ref. , whose product is (3.435 ± 0.065) × 10−6. disp + − L →µ µ ) −6 (where Bdisp refers to The subtraction yields B B(K(K→π + π− ) = (0.045 ± 0.082) × 10 L
Bdisp (KL →µ+ µ− ) B(KL →π+ π− ) can then be multiplied by B(KL → π+π− ) = (2.056±0.033)×10−3 to obtain Bdisp (KL → µ+ µ− ) = (0.093±0.169)×10−9, or Bdisp (KL → µ+ µ− ) < 0.31 × 10−9 at 90% CL. Note that some of the components + − represent quite old measurements. Since B(KL → µ+ µ− ) and Babs γγ (KL → µ µ ) are so
the dispersive part of B(KL → µ+ µ− )).
close, small shifts in the component values could have relatively large consequences for Bdisp (KL → µ+ µ− ). Several of the components could be remeasured by experiments presently in progress1 . Now if one inserts the result of even very conservative recent CKM fits into the formula for the short distance part of B(KL → µ+ µ− ), one gets rather poor agreement with the limit of Bdisp (KL → µ+ µ− ) derived above. For example the 95% CL fit of Hocker et al., ρ¯ = 0.07 − 0.37, gives BSD (KL → µ+ µ− ) = (0.4 − 1.3) × 10−9. So why haven’t we been hearing about this apparent violation of the SM? The answer is that unfortunately KL → γ∗ γ∗ also gives rise to a dispersive contribution, which is much less tractable than the absorptive part, and which can interfere with the short-distance weak contribution that one is trying to extract. The problem in calculating this contribution is the necessity of including intermediate states with virtual photons of
There is a new preliminary result from the KLOE experiment of B(KS → π+ π− )/B(KS → π0 π0 ) = 2.192 ± 0.003stat ± 0.016syst . Fortuitously, inserting this result in place of the PDG value makes no difference to the final limit. 1
Data MC, f(x)=1
800 600 400 200 0
FIGURE 3. Left: Spectrum of x = (mµµ /mK )2 in KL → µ+ µ− γ from Ref.. Right: Determinations of the BMS parameter αK ∗ from three KL decays involving virtual photons.
all effective masses. Thus such calculations can only partially be validated by studies of processes containing virtual photons in the final state. Recently there have been publications on KL → γµ+ µ−  (9327 events), KL → e+ e− e+ e−  (441 events), and KL → µ+ µ− e+ e−  (38 events) and there exist slightly older high statistics data on KL → γe+ e−  (6864 events). Figure 3-left shows the spectrum of x = (mµµ /mK )2 from Ref.. The disagreement between the data (filled circles with error bars) and the prediction of pointlike behavior (histogram) clearly indicates the presence of a form factor. A long-standing candidate for this is provided by the BMS model which depends on a single parameter, αK ∗ . Fig. 3-right shows three determinations of this parameter. The level of agreement of these results leaves something to be desired. Fitting to a more recent parameterization of these decays also results in quite marginal agreement. This may improve when radiative corrections are properly taken into account. Thus additional effort, both experimental and theoretical, is required before the quite precise data on B(KL → µ+ µ− ) can be fully exploited.
K + → π+ νν¯ Theoretically K + → π+ νν¯ is remarkably clean, suffering from none of the long distance complications of KL → µ+ µ− . The hadronic matrix element, so often a problem in other processes, can be calculated to a ∼ 2% via an isospin transformation from that of Ke3 . Interest in K + → π+ νν¯ is driven in large part by its sensitivity to Vtd (it is actually directly sensitive to the quantity |Vts∗Vtd |). Its amplitude is proportional to the dark slanted line at the right in Fig. 1. This is equal to the vector sum of the line proportional to |Vtd |/Aλ3 (where λ ≡ sinθCabibbo ) and that from (1, 0) to the point marked ρ0 . The length ρ0 − 1 along the real axis is proportional to the amplitude for the charm contribution to K + → π+ νν¯ . The QCD corrections to this amplitude, which are responsible for the largest uncertainty in B(K + → π+ νν¯ ), have been calculated to NLLA. The residual uncertainty in the charm amplitude is es-
FIGURE 4. Left: new K + → π+ νν¯ event. Right: Range vs energy of π+ in the final sample. The circles are 1998 data and the triangles 1995-7 data. The events around E = 108 MeV are K + → π+ π0 background. The simulated distribution of expected signal events is indicated by dots.
timated to be ∼ 15% which leads to only a ∼ 6% uncertainty in extracting |Vtd | from B(K + → π+νν¯ ). Recently AGS E787 has seen evidence for a second event of K + → π+νν¯  (see Fig. 4) which, combined with previous data , yields a branch−10 . By comparison, a fit to the CKM pheing ratio B(K + → π+ νν¯ )= (1.57 +1.75 −0.82 ) × 10 nomenology yields the expectation (0.72 ± 0.21) × 10−10 . It is notable that E787 has established methods to reduce the residual background to ∼ 10% of the the signal branching ratio predicted by the SM. A new experiment, AGS E949, based on an upgrade of the E787 detector, is about to begin its first physics run. Using the entire flux of the AGS for 6000 hours, it is designed to reach a sensitivity of ∼ 10−11 /event. In June 2001, Fermilab gave Stage 1 approval to an experiment (CKM) to extend the study of K + → π+ νν¯ by yet an another order of magnitude in sensitivity. This experiment, unlike all previous ones on this process, uses an in-flight rather than a stopping K + technique. This experiment is expected to start collecting data in 2007 or 2008. Fig. 5 shows the history and expectations of progress in studying K + → π+νν¯ .
KL → π0 νν¯ KL → π0 νν¯ is the most attractive target in the kaon system, since it is direct CPviolating to a very good approximation[10, 28] (B(KL → π0 νν¯ ) ∝ η2 ). Like K + → π+νν¯ it has a hadronic matrix element that can be obtained from Ke3 , but, it has no significant contribution from charm. As a result, the intrinsic theoretical uncertainty connecting B(KL → π0 νν¯ ) to the fundamental SM parameters is only about 2%. Note also that B(KL → π0 νν¯ ) is directly proportional to the square of Imλt and that Imλt = 2 −J /[λ(1 − λ2 )] where J is the Jarlskog invariant. Thus a measurement of B(KL → π0 νν¯ ) determines the area of the unitarity triangles with a precision twice as good as that on B(KL → π0 νν¯ ) itself.
FIGURE 5. History and prospects for the study of K + → π+ νν¯ . Points without error bars are single event sensitivities, those with error bars are measured branching ratio.
B(KL → π0 νν¯ ) can be bounded indirectly by measurements of B(K + → π+ νν¯ ) through a nearly model-independent relationship pointed out by Grossman and Nir. The application of this to the new E787 result yields B(KL → π0 νν¯ )< 1.7 × 10−9 at 90% CL. This is far tighter than the current direct experimental limit, 5.9 × 10−7 , obtained by KTeV. To actually measure B(KL → π0 νν¯ ) at the SM level (∼ 3 × 10−11 ), one will need to improve on this by some five orders of magnitude. The KEK E391a experiment proposes to achieve a sensitivity of ∼ 3 × 10−10 /event which would better the indirect limit by a factor five, but would not quite bridge this gap. It will serve as a test for a future much more sensitive experiment to be performed at the Japanese Hadron Facility. E391a features a carefully designed “pencil” beam, and a very high performance photon veto. The active photon detector is a CsI-pure crystal calorimeter. The entire rather compact apparatus will operate in vacuum. Beamline construction and tuning started in March 2000 and physics running is expected to begin in Fall, 2003. The KOPIO experiment at BNL (E926) takes a completely different approach, exploiting the intensity and flexibility of the AGS to make a high-flux, low-energy, microbunched KL beam. The proposed experiment is shown in Fig. 6. The neutral beam will be extracted at ∼ 45o to soften the KL spectrum sufficiently to permit time-offlight determination of the KL velocity. The large production angle also softens the neutron spectrum so that they (and the KL ) are by and large below threshold for the hadro-production of π0 ’s. The beam region will be evacuated to 10−7 Torr to further minimize such production. With a 10m beam channel and this low energy beam, the contribution of hyperons to the background will be negligible. KL decays from a ∼ 3m fiducial region will be accepted. Signal photons impinge on a 2 X0 thick preradiator
capable of measuring their direction. An alternating drift chamber/scintillator plane structure will allow energy measurement as well. A high-precision shashlyk calorimeter downstream of the preradiator will complete the energy measurement. The photon directional information will allow the decay vertex position to be determined. Combined with the target position and time of flight information, this provides a measurement of the KL 3-momentum so that kinematic constraints as well as photon vetoing are available to suppress backgrounds. The leading expected background is KL → π0 π0 , which is initially some eight orders of magnitude larger than the predicted signal. However since π0 ’s from this background have a unique energy in the KL center of mass, a very effective kinematic cut can be applied. This reduces the load on the photon veto system surrounding the decay region to the point where the hermetic veto techniques proven in E787 are sufficient. In fact most of the techniques necessary for KOPIO have been proven in previous experiments or in prototype tests. KOPIO aims to collect about 50 KL → π0 νν¯ events with a signal to background ratio of 2:1. This will permit η to be determined to ∼ 10%, given expected progress in measuring mt and Vcb . KOPIO will run during the ∼20 hours/day the AGS is not needed for injection into RHIC.
FIGURE 6. Layout of the KOPIO detector.
KL → π0 ℓ+ ℓ− These are reactions initially thought experimentally more tractable than KL → π0 νν¯ . Like KL → π0 νν¯ , in the SM they are sensitive to Imλt , but in general they have different sensitivity to BSM effects. Although their signatures are intrinsically superior to that of KL → π0 νν¯ , they are subject to a serious background that has no analogue in the case of the latter: KL → γγℓ+ ℓ− . This process, a radiative correction to KL → γℓ+ ℓ−, occurs roughly 105 times more frequently than KL → π0 ℓ+ ℓ− . Kinematic cuts are quite effective, but it is very difficult to improve the signal:background beyond about 1 : 5. Both varieties of KL → γγℓ+ℓ− have been observed, B(KL → γγe+ e− )kγ >5MeV = (5.84 ± 0.15(stat) ± 0.32(syst)) × 10−7 −9 and B(KL → γγµ+µ− )mγγ >1MeV /c2 = (10.4 +7.5 −5.9 (stat) ± 0.7(syst)) × 10 ; both agree with theoretical prediction. By comparison, in the SM Bdirect (KL → π0 e+ e− ) is predicted to be  (4.3 ± 2.1) × 10−12 and Bdirect (KL → π0 µ+ µ− ) about fives times smaller. In addition to this background, there are two other issues that make the extraction of short-distance information from KL → π0 ℓ+ ℓ− problematical. First, there is an τ indirect CP-violating contribution from the K1 component of KL given by |ε|2 τKKL B(KS → S
π0 e+ e− ) which is of the same order of magnitude as the direct CP-violating piece2 . The exact size of this contribution will be predictable if and when B(KS → π0 e+ e− ) is measured, hopefully by the upcoming NA48/1 experiment. Second is yet another contribution of similar size mediated by KL → π0 γγ which is CP-conserving. To some extent this contribution can be predicted from measurements of the branching ratio and kinematic distributions of KL → π0 γγ, and thousands of these events have been observed. However as indicated in Table 3, a new result from NA48 disagrees by nearly 3σ from the previous result from KTeV. The change in the vector meson exchange contribution, characterized by the parameter aV , reduces the predicted size of BCP−cons (KL → π0 e+ e− ) considerably which is good news for the prospects of measuring Bdirect (KL → π0 e+ e− ). However the validity of the current technique for predicting BCP−cons (KL → π0 e+ e− ) from KL → π0 γγ has recently been reexamined , and questions raised about the functions used to fit the spectrum and about the treatment of the dispersive contribution. Thus both the theoretical and experimental situations are quite unsettled at the moment. Depending on whose data and whose theory one uses, values from 0.25 × 10−12 to 7.3 × 10−12 are predicted for BCP−cons (KL → π0 e+ e− ). TABLE 3. Results on KL → π0 γγ. Exp.
The current experimental status of KL → π0 ℓ+ ℓ− is summarized in Table 4. A factor ∼ 2.5 more data is expected from the KTeV 1999 run, but as can be seen from the table, 2
There is also an interference term between the indirect and direct CP-violating amplitudes.
0.2 0.4 0.3
-0.8 0.11 0.12
FIGURE 7. µ+ polarizations in KL → π0 µ+ µ− , plotted against the muon cm energies. Left: longitudinal polarization. Right: out-of-plane polarization.
background is already starting to be observed at a sensitivity roughly 100 times short of the expected signal level. TABLE 4.
Results on KL → π0 ℓ+ ℓ− .
Mode → π 0 e+ e−
KL KL → π0 µ+ µ−
90% CL upper limit
5.1 × 10−10
1.06 ± 0.41 0.87 ± 0.15
3.8 × 10−10
To make a useful measurement under these conditions will require markedly increased statistics on the signal and both theoretical and experimental advances in the ancillary modes KL → π0 γγ and KS → π0 e+ e− . Various approaches for mitigating these problems have been suggested over the years including studies of the Dalitz Plot , the time development , or both . However an innovative approach has recently been suggested  in which muon polarization in KL → π0 µ+ µ− as well as kinematic distributions are exploited. The µ+ longitudinal polarization is proportional to the direct CP-violating amplitude, whereas the energy asymmetry and the out-of-plane polarization depend on both indirect and direct CP violating amplitudes. As shown in Fig. 7, the polarizations involved turn out to be extremely large so that enormous numbers of events may not be required.
An alternative parameterization Although it is customary to write the branching ratios and other observables of the one-loop processes in terms of the Wolfenstein parameterization of the CKM matrix, this parameterization is not really natural to the kaon system, and puts results from this system at a certain disadvantage in comparisons with those from the B system. To extract information on ρ and η, for example, it is necessary to divide the physical measurements by λ8 A4 , thereby introducing “external” contributions to the uncertainty of 8σλ and 4σA . One can avoid this by resorting to expressions for the branching ratios in terms of the
quantity λt . Since as noted above, the imaginary part of this quantity determines the area of all unitarity triangles, it is no less fundamental than ρ and η. The formulae for the branching ratios of three of the decays discussed above are: B(K + → π+ νν¯ ) = ξ[(λc X¯ + Re(λt )Xt )2 + (Im(λt )Xt )2 ] BSD (KL → µ+ µ− ) = ξ′ [Re(λc)YNL + Re(λt )Y (xt )]2 B(KL → π0 νν¯ ) = ξ′′ (Im(λt )Xt )2
(1) (2) (3)
where 3rK + α2 BK + e3 Vus2 2π2 sin4 θW τKL α2 BK + µν ′ ξ ≡ τK + Vus2 π2 sin4 θW 3rKL τKL α2 BK + e3 ξ′′ ≡ τK +Vus2 2π2 sin4 θW ξ≡
= 1.55 × 10−4
= 6.32 × 10−3
= 6.77 × 10−4
and to a good approximation the Inami-Lim  functions Xt = 1.56(mt /170GeV)1.15 , Yt = 1.02(mt /170GeV)1.56 . The quantities rK + = 0.901 and rKL = 0.944 are isospin correction factors that relate the hadronic matrix elements of the K → πνν¯ processes to that of K + → π0 e+ ν . The terms X¯ and YNL are the Inami-Lim functions for the charm contributions which, after correction to NLLA, are known to about 15%.
FIGURE 8. Comparison of 90% CL constraints from current data on rare kaon decays with 95% CL constraints from a typical unitarity fit (based on Ref. ). The allowed region from kaon decays lies between the two circles and within the outer two vertical lines.
Fig. 8 shows the 90% CL constraints currently available from KL → µ+ µ− and → π+νν¯ . To extract a limit from the former we adopt the value for the maximum long distance dispersive contribution from Ref. . Also shown is the region in the λt plane bounded by the CKM fit mentioned above . The two kinds of information are clearly consistent at the moment. Note, however, that if the current central value K+
of B(K + → π+ νν¯ ) should hold through E949, and expected progress is made in the B sector, this agreement could prove short-lived, as shown on the left of Fig. 9. When, eventually, we have 10-15% measurements of B(K + → π+ νν¯ ) and B(KL → π0 νν¯ ), comparison of K and B results will become a critical test of the SM. Fig. 9 (right) illustrates a scenario in which such a failure is evident.
FIGURE 9. Left: Similar plot to Fig. 8 after 10−11 /event K + → π+ νν¯ experiment. Assumes central value of B(K + → π+ νν¯ ) stays the same and also that CKM fit contours and precision on mt are improved by a factor 2. Right: Similar plot for possible scenario after 10% measurements of |λt | and Im(λt ). Further improvements in CKM parameters and mt assumed.
CONCLUSIONS The success of lepton flavor violation experiments in reaching sensitivities corresponding to mass scales of well over 100 TeV has helped kill most models predicting accessible LFV in kaon decay. The most popular varieties of SUSY predict LFV at levels far beyond the current experimental state of the art . Thus new dedicated experiments in this area are unlikely in the near future. The existing precision measurement of KL → µ+ µ− will be very useful if theorists can make enough progress on calculating the dispersive long-distance amplitude, perhaps helped by experimental progress in KL → γℓ+ ℓ−, KL → 4 leptons, etc. The exploitation of KL → µ+ µ− would also be aided by higher precision measurements of some of the normalizing reactions, such as KL → γγ. K + → π+ νν¯ will clearly be further exploited. Two coordinated initiatives are devoted to this: a 10−11 /event experiment (E949) just underway at the BNL AGS and a 10−12 /event experiment (CKM) recently approved for the FNAL Main Injector. The first dedicated experiment to seek KL → π0 νν¯ (E391a) is proceeding and an experiment (KOPIO) at the AGS with the goal of making a ∼ 10% measurement of Im(λt ) is approved and in R&D. Measurements of K + → π+ νν¯ and KL → π0 νν¯ can determine an alternative unitarity triangle that will offer a critical comparison with results from the B system. If new physics is in play in the flavor sector, the two triangles will almost certainly disagree.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank D. Bryman, M. Diwan, F. Gabbiani, D. Jaffe, S. Kettell, G. Valencia, and M. Zeller for useful discussions, access to results, and other materials. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886.
S.L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D, 2, 1285 (1970). Ambrose, D., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 5734–5737 (1998). Appel, R., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 2450–2453 (2000). Appel, R., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 2877–2880 (2000). Ledovskoy, A., Recent Results from KTeV Rare KL Decays (2001), talk given at the KAON2001 International Conference on CP Violation. Alavi-Harati, A., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 111802 (2001). Adler, S. C., et al., Further evidence for the decay K + → π+ νν¯ (2001), hep-ex/0111091. Adler, S. C., et al., Search for the rare decay K + → π+ γ (2001), hep-ex/0108006. Cahn, R. N., and Harari, H., Nucl. Phys., B176, 135 (1980). Littenberg, L. S., Phys. Rev., D39, 3322–3324 (1989). Buchalla, G., and Buras, A. J., Nucl. Phys., B412, 106–142 (1994). Ambrose, D., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 1389–1392 (2000). Groom, D. E., et al., Eur. Phys. J., C15, 1–878 (2000). Di Domenico, A., Recent Results from KLOE at DAΦNE (2001), talk given at the fifth KEK topical conference Frontiers in Flavor Physics, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, Nov 20-22, 2001. Hocker, A., Lacker, H., Laplace, S., and Le Diberder, F., Eur. Phys. J., C21, 225–259 (2001). Hocker, A., Lacker, H., Laplace, S., and Diberder, F. L., CKM Matrix: Status and New Developments (2001), hep-ph/0112295. Alavi-Harati, A., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 071801 (2001). Alavi-Harati, A., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 5425–5429 (2001). Fanti, V., et al., Phys. Lett., B458, 553–563 (1999). Bergstrom, L., Masso, E., and Singer, P., Phys. Lett., B131, 229 (1983). D’Ambrosio, G., Isidori, G., and Portoles, J., Phys. Lett., B423, 385–394 (1998). Marciano, W. J., and Parsa, Z., Phys. Rev., D53, 1–5 (1996). Buchalla, G., and Buras, A. J., Nucl. Phys., B548, 309–327 (1999). Adler, S. C., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 3768–3770 (2000). D’Ambrosio, G., and Isidori, G., K + → π+ νν¯ : a rising star on the stage of flavour physics (2001), hep-ph/0112135. Bassalleck, B., et al., E949: An experiment to measure the branching ratio B(K + → π+ νν¯ ) (1999). Cooper, P. S., Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 99N3, 121–126 (2001). Buchalla, G., and Isidori, G., Phys. Lett., B440, 170–178 (1998). Jarlskog, C., Phys. Rev. Lett., 55, 1039 (1985). Grossman, Y., and Nir, Y., Phys. Lett., B398, 163–168 (1997). Alavi-Harati, A., et al., Phys. Rev., D61, 072006 (2000). Inagaki, T., A plan for the experimental study on the KL → π0 νν¯ decay at KEK (1996), talk given at 3rd International Workshop on Particle Physics Phenomenology, Taipei, Taiwan, 14-17 Nov 1996. Konaka, A., KL → π0 νν¯ at the AGS (1998), hep-ex/9903016. Buras, A. J., Colangelo, G., Isidori, G., Romanino, A., and Silvestrini, L., Nucl. Phys., B566, 3–32 (2000). Greenlee, H. B., Phys. Rev., D42, 3724–3731 (1990). Alavi-Harati, A., et al., Phys. Rev., D64, 012003 (2001). Alavi-Harati, A., et al., Phys. Rev., D62, 112001 (2000). Buras, A. J., Flavor dynamics: CP violation and rare decays (2001), hep-ph/0101336.
39. Batley, B., et al., A high sensitivity investigation of ks and neutral hyperon decays, Tech. Rep. SPSC/P253, CERN/SPSC2000-002 (1999). 40. Zinchenko, A., New results on rare decays and on future NA48 (2001), talk given at HADRON2001. 41. Alavi-Harati, A., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 917–921 (1999). 42. D’Ambrosio, G., and Portoles, J., Nucl. Phys., B492, 417–454 (1997). 43. Gabbiani, F., and Valencia, G., Phys. Rev., D64, 094008 (2001). 44. Alavi-Harati, A., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 397–401 (2001). 45. Alavi-Harati, A., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 5279–5282 (2000). 46. Donoghue, J. F., Holstein, B. R., and Valencia, G., Phys. Rev., D35, 2769 (1987). 47. Kohler, G. O., and Paschos, E. A., Phys. Rev., D52, 175–180 (1995). 48. Littenberg, L. S., CP violation in KL → π0 e+ e− (1988), in *Vancouver 1988, Proceedings, CP violation at KAON Factory* 19-28. 49. Diwan, M. V., Ma, H., and Trueman, T. L., Muon decay asymmetries from KL0 → π0 µ+ µ− decays (2001), hep-ex/0112350. 50. Inami, T., and Lim, C. S., Prog. Theor. Phys., 65, 297 (1981). 51. Belyaev, A., et al., Charged-lepton flavour violation in kaon decays in supersymmetric theories (2000), hep-ph/0008276.