Aug 19, 2015 - EDM, and Higgs coupling to di-photon are reviewed in Sec. ...... the typical new physics contribution to the lepton EDM can be naively given by ...
Mar 23, 2017 - Abstract. We discuss the prospects for charged Higgs boson searches at the LHC, within the two-Higgs-doublet models (2HDM). The 2HDM is ...
Aug 19, 2015 - the charged lepton flavor violation (cLFV), the electric dipole moment (EDM), and the Higgs coupling to di-photon. First, we start from the dipole contributions of leptons, generated by the electromagnetic form factor of leptons in Sec
Dec 17, 2007 - The surveys require many high precision radial velocity observations of each star in the survey, and hence a significant ..... yield more information about the model parameters than if the next observation time were chosen randomly. On
Aug 16, 2012 - The SPC and SME results, both based on comparisons between synthetic spectra .... Note. â U = unconstrained analysis (log g free); C = con-.
Mar 27, 2013 - are monitoring a very large number of stars in order to detect real time on going microlensing events and alert ... the events to increase the monitoring cadence and then sensitivity to exoplanets. From a ..... brand DUNE) in 2007 to E
Sep 9, 2015 - 'background' is generated through many time-slides of the data. ..... Star (a COST-funded Research Networking Programme). We would like to ...
May 1, 2015 - different results. Therefore, we consider the analysis that follows as a first test for the feasibility of an approximate method. As argued above, we expect ..... CBC. CBC allâsky. Bezier. Bezier allâsky. FIG. 3: The plot on the lef
Aug 1, 2013 - combine collider searches, direct detection, and indirect detection in a complementary way, if we are to determine ... 10 GeV or when the operator has suppressed direct de- tection signals. The generic signature of dark ... Email: aless
Dec 2, 2009 - associated with the Andromeda galaxy was able to confidently exclude a compact bi- nary coalescence at ... wave emission , but did not exclude a binary coalescence event at larger distances. Searching for ... Briefly, the design call
May 2, 2014 - the first direct evidence for intermediate mass black holes and open a new, intriguing channel for probing the .... 1 The installation of a third LIGO detector in India (IndIGO) is .... FIG. 2. (color online) a) Effective radius in Gpc
naturally explained as a pentaquark state of four quarks and an antiquark (ududs). According to the Standard Model (SM), baryons .... scribed by this approach [37, 38]. These models operate under the ... Results of four-prong final states (including
Jul 5, 2018 - which add an extra massive scalar degree of freedom to General Relativity. ...... fa = 1017 GeV, ms = 10â12 eV, RNS = 18 km, MNS = 1.25Mâ.
May 2, 2017 - MHÂ± = MA = 100 GeV,. MH = 150 GeV,. (5.4) we show in Fig. 1 branching ratios for the different Yukawa models. Since the ÏÎ½ and cs couplings ...
Nov 4, 2016 - (3) An electromagnetic calorimeter (EMC) consisting of 6240 CsI(Tl) crystals in a cylindrical structure (barrel) and two end-caps. The energy resolution at 1.0 GeV is 2.5% (5%) and the position resolution is 6 mm (9 mm) in the barrel (e
May 11, 2011 - The Higgs potential in the standard model (SM) provides a simple description of the dynamics of ...... D79, 035002 (2009).  M. Buican, P. Meade, N. Seiberg, D. Shih, JHEP 0903 (2009) 016. 13 ... J. C 38 (2005) 395.
Oct 28, 2012 - model (IBM) [29, 30, 31], the generating coordinate model (GCM, also called ..... 120-370. GERDA-II. 35. 0.35. 1. 6. 0.85. 0.88. 20. 18. 60-170.
Aug 6, 2015 - Data will be searched for continuum emission and line features, and strategies will be adopted according to findings. Clearly discoveries will modify any strategies defined a priori. 3.1 Milky Way Galaxy. The centre of the Milky Way has
Dec 9, 2009 - binaries in the well-known Orion Nebula Cluster. BrÎ³ emission, which we detect in several systems, is used as a tracer for the presence of an ...
signal presents a strong subâdiary dependence on time, due to the motion of the Sun in the sky. All this information can be used[ 9] to extract a posi- ble axion ...
Oct 2, 2010 - Z', mono-jet approach. No systematics (FC). Systematics included (FC). 1 STD range topcolor Z' (hep-ph/9911288). ATLAS. -1. = 10 TeV, 200 ...
Abstract. Over the past decade, extensive studies have been undertaken to search for photon signals from dark matter annihilation or decay for dark matter particle masses above. â¼ 1 GeV. However, due to the lacking sensitivity of current experiment
Nov 7, 2017 - The annihilation of Weakly Interactive Massive Particles (WIMP) in the centre of the sun could give rise to neutrino fluxes. We study the prospects of searching for these neutrinos at the upcoming Iron CALorime- ter (ICAL) detector to b
Jan 17, 2008 - typical sources are photon noise and sky background noise. White noise decreases with increasing brightness of the observed target. Red noise is defined as noise that is correlated from data point to data point; it is not necessarily r
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000–000 (0000)
Printed 16 April 2017
(MN LATEX style file v1.4)
Prospects for Spectroscopic Reflected-light Planet Searches Christopher Leigh 1 , Andrew Collier Cameron 1 , Tristan Guillot 1 2
University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, U.K Observatoire de la Cote d’Azur, B.P. 4229, 06304 Nice, Cedex 4, France
arXiv:astro-ph/0308414v1 23 Aug 2003
16 April 2017
High-resolution spectroscopic searches for the starlight reflected from close-in extrasolar giant planets have the capability of determining the optical albedo spectra and scattering properties of these objects. When combined with radial velocity measurements they also yield the true mass of the planet. To date, only two such planets have been targeted for reflected-light signals, yielding upper limits on the planets’ optical albedos. Here we examine the prospects for future searches of this kind. We present Monte Carlo estimates of prior probability distributions for the orbital velocity amplitudes and planet/star flux ratios of 6 bright stars known to harbour giant planets in orbits with periods of less than 5 days. Using these estimates, we assess the viability of these targets for future reflected-light searches using 4m and 8m-class telescopes. Key Words: Planets: extra-solar - Planets: atmosphere - Planets: reflected-light
Spectral models of close-orbiting giant exoplanets (Seager & Sasselov 1998; Marley, Gelino & Stephens 1999; Goukenleuque, Bezard & Lellouch 1999; Sudarsky, Burrows & Pinto 2000; Barman, Hauschildt & Allard 2001; Sudarsky, Burrows & Hubeny 2003; Baraffe et al. 2003) show that scattered starlight dominates over thermal emission at optical wavelengths, but the albedo is very sensitive to the depth of cloud formation. Sudarsky, Burrows & Pinto (2000) find that the relatively low surface gravities of planets such as υ Andromeda b, HD 75289 b and HD 209458 b may favour the formation of relatively bright, high-altitude silicate cloud decks. On higher-gravity objects such as τ Bootis b, however, the same models predict a much deeper cloud deck. In this case, much of the optical spectrum is absorbed by the resonance lines of the alkali metals. The Na I D lines in particular are strongly broadened by collisions with H2 molecules. In reality, however, the atmospheric structure of closeorbiting giant planets (hereafter “Pegasi Planets”) is expected to be more complex, with strong winds and horizontal temperature variations (Showman & Guillot 2002), and possible temporal variations (Cho et al. 2003). The combined atmospheric circulation and temperature variations are likely to yield a disequilibrium chemical composition. Furthermore, the location and characteristics of any cloud decks cannot be predicted to any great precision with present theoretical knowledge. The next logical step towards understanding the properties and evolution of these objects will be to test these emerging models by measuring the albedos of these Pegasi planets directly. c 0000 RAS
A planet of radius Rp orbiting a distance a from a star intercepts a fraction (Rp /2a)2 of the stellar luminosity. The proximity of Pegasi planets to their parent stars make them excellent prospects for reflected-light searches. At optical wavelengths, starlight scattered off the planet’s atmosphere is expected to dominate over thermal emission. Charbonneau et al. (1999); Collier Cameron et al. (1999) showed that the planet/star flux ratio
ε(α, λ) ≡
fp (α, λ) Rp = p(λ) f⋆ (λ) a
g (α, λ)
is expected to vary with the star-planet-observer illumination angle α, giving a small periodic modulation to the system brightness in the form of the phase function g(α, λ). Here p(λ) represents the geometric albedo of the planet’s atmosphere that, like the phase function, is wavelength (λ) dependent. Assuming a grey albedo model, i.e. no wavelength dependence, the amplitude of optical flux variability for a typical Pegasi planet system is expected to be ∆f ≤ 8.3 × 10−5 f
R /1.4R 2 p J up a/0.045AU
Future space-based photometry missions are expected to be able to detect and measure this modulation with ease. However, the orbital inclination (and hence planet’s mass) cannot be determined directly form the light-curve, since the form of the phase function g(α, λ) is unknown.
C.Leigh, A.Collier Cameron, T.Guillot
υ And τ Boo 51 Peg HD 179949 HD 75289 HD 209458
F8V 1 F7V 1 G2V 1 F8V 2 G0V 3 F9V 1
4.09 4.50 5.46 6.25 6.35 7.65
Tef f (K) 6107±80 6360±80 5793±70 6115±50 6000±50 6000±50
Table 1. Stellar parameters for bright stars known to harbour Pegasi planets. 1 Gray, Napier & Winkler (2001), 2 Houk & SmithMoore (1988), 3 Gratton, Focardi & Bandiera (1989), 4 Fuhrmann, Pfeiffer & Bernkopf (1998), 5 Gray (1992), 6 Henry et al. (2000a), 7 Synchronised rotation assumed from Baliunas et al. (1997); Henry et al. (2000a), 8 Mazeh et al. (2000), 9 Groot, Piters & van Paradijs (1996), 10 Benz & Mayor (1984), 11 Tinney et al. (2001), 12 Udry et al. (2000), 13 Estimate based on spectral type 14 Average of Spectroscopic studies by Fuhrmann, Pfeiffer & Bernkopf (1997); Fuhrmann, Pfeiffer & Bernkopf (1998); Gonzalez (1998); Gonzalez & Laws (2000); Gonzalez et al. (2001) 15 Estimated from Tinney et al. (2001); Udry et al. (2000), 16 Cody & Sasselov (2002) 17 Queloz et al. (2000), 18 Average from Barnes (2001); Queloz et al. (2000)
K∗ (m.s−1 )
υ And b τ Boo b 51 Peg b HD 179949 b HD 75289 b HD 209458 b
Table 2. System parameters for known Pegasi planets around bright stars. 1 Private Communication - Geoff Marcy, 2 Butler et al. (1997), 3 Mayor & Queloz (1995); Marcy et al. (1997), 4 Tinney et al. (2001), 5 Udry et al. (2000), 6 Henry et al. (2000b). The results in columns 4 and 5 are calculated from stellar and planetary parameters using the equations detailed in Section 3. Effective planetary temperature and radius estimates are given for the estimated age of the system, assuming an edge-on inclination i = 90 (i.e. upper limit).
SPECTROSCOPIC REFLECTED-LIGHT SEARCHES
Starlight reflected from a planet’s atmosphere contains copies of all the thousands of photospheric stellar absorption lines, Doppler-shifted by the planet’s orbital motion and modulated in strength by the phase function g(α, λ). By detecting and characterising the planetary reflected-light signature we observe the planet/star flux ratio as a function of orbital phase and wavelength. The information we aim to obtain (in order of increasing difficulty) comprises:
Several attempts have been made to detect this “faint” echo of the starlight, using high-precision spectral subtraction and pattern-matching techniques. Charbonneau et al. (1999); Collier Cameron et al. (1999) and Leigh et al. (2003) searched independently for starlight reflected from τ Bootis b, establishing an upper limit on the planet/star flux ratio that would be seen if the planet were viewed fully illuminated, with Rp 2 < 10−4 (3) a for the observed wavelength range of 407 - 649 nm. For an assumed planetary radius Rp = 1.2 RJ up , the Leigh et al. (2003) 99.9% confidence levels (Fig. 3a) suggest a geometric albedo p < 0.39 at the most probable orbital inclination i ∼ 40◦ , assuming a grey albedo model. Collier Cameron et al. (2002) used the same technique on υ Andromeda b, establishing an upper radius limit Rp < 1.22RJ up , assuming a grey geometric albedo of p = 0.5. (Fig. 3b). Both Collier Cameron et al. (2002) and Leigh et al. (2003) find possible detections above the 2σ significance level, which if confirmed would yield masses of 0.74 and 7.28 MJ up respectively for υ And b and τ Bootis b. Howε0 = p
• Kp , the planet’s projected orbital velocity. From this we learn the orbital inclination i and hence the planet mass Mp , since Mp sin i is known form the star’s Doppler wobble. • ǫ0 , the maximum strength of the reflected starlight that would be seen if the planet were viewed fully illuminated. • p(λ), the albedo spectrum, which depends on the composition and structure of the planet’s atmosphere. • g(α, λ), the phase function describing the dependence of the amount of light reflected toward the observer by the star-planet-observer angle α.
c 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000
Prospects for Spectroscopic Reflected-light Planet Searches ever, there is a ∼ 4 to 8% probability that the detected features, shown at Figure 3, are a consequence of non-gaussian noise, and as a result neither are confident enough to claim a genuine detection.
The known stellar parameters for 6 bright stars known (from Doppler wobble studies) to harbour Pegasi planets are set out in Table 1. Fits to the radial velocity data have provided us with orbital periods for the planets, together with the stellar reflex velocity K∗ of each star about the common centre-of-mass of the system. Both parameters are set out in Table 2 alongside calculated values for the orbital radius of the system (from Kepler’s Laws) and the minimum planet mass. In addition, we provide theoretical estimates for the effective temperature and upper limit on the radius of the planet (for edge-on orbits), assuming both “Hot” and “Cold/Dissipative” atmospheric structure models, as described in Section 3.2.
Planetary Mass Estimates
Among the known Pegasi planets there are several promising candidates for future spectroscopic reflected-light searches. The main selection criteria are that the host star must be bright, and that the planet/star flux ratio near superior conjunction must be high. Given spectroscopic and/or photometric estimates of the stellar radius R∗ , the projected rotation speed v sin i and rotation period Prot , we estimate sin i =
Prot v sin i 2πR∗
This makes the assumption that the stellar rotation axis and the orbital plane are close to perpendicular, as was determined for HD 209458 by Queloz et al. (2000). The mass ratio q = Mp /M∗ follows from the observed orbital period Porb and stellar reflex velocity K∗ : q K∗ Porb = 1+q 2πa sin i
This then provides us with the planet’s projected orbital velocity amplitude (Kp = K∗ /q) in addition to the planet mass (Mp = qM∗ ).
Planetary Radius Estimates
Assuming a known mass, the radius of a gaseous planet is governed by its Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction, and the following factors, in order of significance: (1) its composition; (2) its atmospheric temperature; (3) its age; and (4) possible additional energy sources. Uncertainties also stem from our limited understanding of the underlying physics: equations of state, opacities - see Guillot (1999). The measurement of the radius of HD 209458 b (Charbonneau et al. 2000; Henry et al. 2000b; Brown et al. 2001) showed that the planet is essentially made of hydrogen and helium (Guillot et al. 1996; Burrows et al. 2000), thus addressing the first source of uncertainty concerning the radii c 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000
of Pegasi planets. However, it was later shown that the radius of HD 209458 b is too large to be explained by standard evolution models using realistic atmospheric boundary conditions (Bodenheimer, Lin & Mardling 2001; Guillot & Showman 2002; Baraffe et al. 2003). Although Burrows, Sudarsky & Hubbard (2003) question the need to invoke additional atmospheric energy sources, Bodenheimer, Lin & Mardling (2001) proposed that HD 209458 b may be kept inflated by the dissipation of tidal energy through the circularization of its orbit. Due to the very small eccentricity of the orbit (consistent with 0.0), Showman & Guillot (2002) proposed two alternative explanations: either the atmosphere is relatively cold, as predicted by radiative transfer calculations, and kinetic energy generated in the atmosphere is dissipated relatively deep in the interior (e.g. by tides due to a slightly asynchronous rotation of the interior), or the atmosphere is hotter than calculated, for example because shear instabilities force it into a quasi-adiabatic state. We therefore calculate the radii of other Pegasi planets on the following basis: • All Pegasi planets have approximately the same composition (they are mostly made of hydrogen and helium). • Their atmosphere is either “hot” or “cold”, the temperature at a given level (10 bars) being calculated as a function of the effective temperature and gravity, as described in Guillot & Showman (2002) (see also Burrows et al. (1997)), assuming a bond albedo equal to 0.4. • In the “cold” case, an additional energy flux is deposited at the centre of the planet. This flux is set equal to 8 × 10−3 times the absorbed stellar luminosity (i.e. between 1.2 and 3.1 × 1026 erg s−1 ). This corresponds to the energy flux necessary to reproduce the radius of HD 209458 b with the “cold” boundary conditions (Guillot & Showman 2002). Of course, a number of unknowns remain. Most importantly, both the composition, bond albedo and the energy flux dissipated in the planet are likely to be complex functions of the planetary mass, orbital distance and even stellar type. However, this is likely to be a second order effect because our radii calculations take advantage of the known radius of HD 209458 b. It is interesting to see that even though the parameters of the models have been set by the constraint on HD 209458 b, the “hot” and “cold” scenarios shown in Figure 1 yield significantly different radii for the other planets. This is due to the fact that energy dissipation (in the “cold” case) has a greater impact on planets of smaller mass, and that the “hot” boundary condition yields a planetary radius that is more sensitive to the orbital distance. 3.3
Flux Ratio Estimates
For a Lambert-sphere phase function g(α) we can compute the maximum expected planet/star flux ratio near to superior conjunction, Rp 2 . (6) a We adopt the Lambert-sphere phase function because it provides a good approximation to the phase functions of gas giants within our own solar system (Pollack et al. 1986; Charbonneau et al. 1999). Although we expect the albedo spectra
(fp /f∗ )max = pg(π/2 − i)
C.Leigh, A.Collier Cameron, T.Guillot Evolution of υ Andromeda b
Evolution of τ Bootis b
1.6 Hot model (sini = 1.0) Cold model (sini = 1.0) Hot model (sini = 0.5) Cold model (sini = 0.5)
Hot model (sini = 1.0) Cold model (sini = 1.0) Hot model (sini = 0.5) Cold model (sini = 0.5) 1.5
3000 Age (Myrs)
Evolution of 51 Pegasi b
2500 3000 Age (Myrs)
Evolution of HD 179949 b
1.8 Hot model (sini = 1.0) Cold model (sini = 1.0) Hot model (sini = 0.5) Cold model (sini = 0.5)
Hot model (sini = 1.0) Cold model (sini = 1.0) Hot model (sini = 0.5) Cold model (sini = 0.5)
1.2 1.2 1.1
3000 Age (Myrs)
Evolution of HD 75289 b
3000 Age (Myrs)
Evolution of HD 209458 b
2 Hot model (sini = 1.0) Cold model (sini = 1.0) Hot model (sini = 0.5) Cold model (sini = 0.5)
Hot model (sini = 1.0) Cold model (sini = 1.0)
3000 Age (Myrs)
4000 Age (Myrs)
Figure 1. Evolutionary radius models for the planets surrounding υ Andromeda, τ Bootis, 51 Pegasi, HD 179949, HD 75289 and HD 209458. The evolutionary tracks show both the “Hot” and “Cold/Dissipative” models for orbital inclinations of sin i = 0.5 and sin i = 1.0 (Edge-on). Being a known transiting planet, HD 209458 b is shown solely for sin i = 1.0.
of Pegasi planets to exhibit a strong wavelength dependence, here we adopt a simple grey geometric albedo p = 0.4 as a plausible comparison to the case of a high, reflective silicate cloud deck with little overlying absorption, as in the Class V models of Sudarsky, Burrows & Pinto (2000). Other models in which cloud layers are deeper, or even absent, produce lower optical albedos; thus the flux ratios we compute here should be treated as upper limits on the plausible planet/star flux ratio.
Spectroscopic reflected-light searches should provide us with a unique opportunity to achieve the direct detection of a Pegasi planet, however there exist a number of potential difficulties that require a cautious approach to any analysis. (i) At the flux ratios we are working (fp /f∗ < 10−4 ), we inevitably see the appearence of systematic non-gaussian noise within data sets, noise that requires to be carefully identified and corrected for in the subsequent analysis. (ii) Any predictions from our searches require assumptions to be made about the nature of the planetary system, c 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000
Prospects for Spectroscopic Reflected-light Planet Searches
Figure 2. Prior probability density maps for the planet/star flux ratio near superior conjunction, as a function of the planet’s projected orbital velocity Kp , for an assumed geometric albedo p = 0.4. The maps are calculated for an evolutionary radius model that exhibits a “Hot” atmospheric structure, although maximum likelihood values for both the “Hot” and “Cold” scenarios are shown at Table 3. Trials in which the orbital inclination was high enough to cross the observer’s line of sight to the stellar disc were rejected for all cases bar HD 209458 b, since none of these other systems has been seen to exhibit transits (Henry et al. 2000a; Tinney et al. 2001). For the transiting planet, its known inclination and mass act to constrain the projected radial velocity amplitude. In the case of τ Bootis, an additional constraint was applied. Since the rotation of the primary appears to have become synchronised with the planet’s orbit (Baliunas et al. 1997; Collier Cameron et al. 1999; Henry et al. 2000a), the planet must have been massive enough to have synchronised the star’s spin within its own main sequence lifetime. For each trial we computed both the main sequence lifetime and the synchronisation timescale. Trials in which the latter exceeded the former were rejected. This, in conjunction with the well determined v sin i value, leads to a fairly tight constraint on the system inclination and hence Kp .
Kp (km.s−1 )
Mp /MJ up
υ And b τ Boo b 51 Peg b HD 179949 b HD 75289 b HD 209458 b
133 95 117 135 141 144
78 37 63 60 75 87
0.760 6.813 0.523 0.945 0.498 0.620
(fp /f∗ )max Hot model 4.88 4.18 4.81 6.44 7.38 7.18
Table 3. Maximum likelihood statistics for the parameter distributions returned by the Monte Carlo trials, given what we already know about the system from observation. In adopting a grey albedo of p = 0.4 for our trials, similar to that of the Class V models of Sudarsky, Burrows & Pinto (2000). In reality, we would expect the albedo spectra of Pegasi planets to exhibit a strong wavelength dependence. However, we believe the use of a grey albedo spectra provides us with a realistic upper limit to the expected planet/star flux ratio.
c 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000
C.Leigh, A.Collier Cameron, T.Guillot
Figure 3. Results from reflected-light studies of (a) τ Bootis (Leigh et al. 2003) and (b) υ Andromeda (Collier Cameron et al. 2002), shown as relative probability maps of model parameters Kp and log(ǫ0 ) = log p(Rp /a)2 . The results are derived from WHT/UES observations of τ Bootis and υ Andromeda, assuming a grey albedo spectrum. The greyscale denotes the probability relative to the best-fit model, increasing from 0 for white to 1 for black. The contours show the confidence levels at which candidate detections can be ruled out as being caused by spurious alignments of non-Gaussian noise features. From top to bottom, they show the 99.9%, 99.0%, 95.4% and 68.3% confidence limits. The dark features in each probability map represent candidate planetary detections from the data but occur at too low a confidence level to guarantee a genuine detection. We note, however, that in both cases the main features appear close to the Kp values predicted at Table 3 by Monte Carlo simulations and shown at Figure 2.
υ And τ Boo 51 Peg HD 179949 HD 75289 HD 209458
4.09 4.50 5.46 6.25 6.35 7.65
(fp /f∗ )max Hot model 4.88 4.18 4.81 6.44 7.38 7.18
Table 4. Exposure time predictor to compare benefits of observing different star and telescope class combinations. We take 4m-class observations on υ Andromeda as our standard, with an exposure time benchmark of 20.0 hrs required to reach the predicted (fp /f∗ )max signal levels. In deriving these estimates we assume that all other variables are equal, such as overall instrument efficiency, observing strategies and weather conditions.
such as the phase function g(α, λ), the planetary radius Rp or albedo spectra p(λ), and that the orbital and stellar equatorial planes are co-aligned. To some extent observational results will therefore act to narrow the range of parameter space occupied by these Pegasi planets, although stronger detections will allow us to draw more definite conclusions. (iii) The “Doppler Wobble” method of detection confirms the existence of a planet but cannot tell us its true orbital inclination. A spectroscopic search for the reflectedlight component of a close orbiting planet has the potential to identify the projected orbital velocity Kp and hence the orbital tilt. However, with such a scope of possible Kp values, it is important to estimate where we might expect to detect the planet, given the known parameters of the system. Such estimates, as detailed in Section 5, provide us with a quantifiable method by which we can assess the plausibility of any candidate detection.
We derive the prior probability distributions for the observable quantities Kp and (fp /f∗ )max by drawing randomly from the uncertainty distributions (assumed gaussian) for the observed quantities K∗ , M∗ , R∗ , Prot, Age and v sin i. The values of these quantities, for 6 of the brightest stars known to harbour Pegasi planets with orbital periods of less than 5 days, are given in Tables 1 and 2. In order to provide a radius estimate for each planet Rp , we use our sin i estimate to conduct a log Rp − log Mp linear interpolation (for a selected Age) between the sin i = 1.0 and sin i = 0.5 evolutionary models. This is done for both the “Hot” and “Cold” evolutionary scenarios. In each case we performed 1,000,000 random Monte Carlo trials to compute Kp and log(fp /f∗ )max . The resulting joint probability distributions for the planet/star flux ratio and projected orbital velocity amplitude are presented in Figure 2. c 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000
Prospects for Spectroscopic Reflected-light Planet Searches 6
The maximum observable planet/star flux ratio for a planet depends strongly on the inclination of its orbit to our line of sight, and on the distance of the planet from the star. The statistical analyses presented here provide estimates of the planet/star flux ratio, derived from the best data currently available on 6 bright stars harbouring planets with orbital periods of less than 5 days. These estimates are modeldependent, in that we have made theoretical assumptions about each planet’s radius, the co-alignment of each orbital plane to the stellar rotation axis and used a Lambert-sphere phase function to describe the atmospheric scattering properties. In addition, we have adopted a grey geometric albedo (p = 0.4) that corresponds roughly to the reflective, highlevel silicate cloud decks predicted by the Class V spectral models of Sudarsky, Burrows & Pinto (2000). Recent spectroscopic searches for relected-light signatures from τ Bootis b (Leigh et al. 2003) and υ Andromeda b (Collier Cameron et al. 2002), shown at Figure 3, have already reached detection limits comparable to the signal levels predicted here, using echelle spectrographs on 4m-class telescopes. We find the total number of photons that must be collected scales with the square of the planet/star flux ratio, whilst the length of time required to collect this number of photons with a given telescope scales with the flux received from the star. If we adopt 4m-class observations of υ Andromeda as our benchmark (20.0 hrs) to reach the (fp /f∗ )max signal levels predicted, then Table 4 details the relative exposure times for each planetary system, given access to both 4m and 8m-class telescope facilities. Given that it has been possible to probe to these deep signal levels for υ And in only a few nights on a 4m-class telescope, the remaining 5 targets are clearly viable and compelling targets for future studies with existing high-throughput spectrographs on 8m-class telescopes. Future instruments that are also likely to be useful in this respect include the highefficiency fibre-fed echelle spectrograph ESPADONS, which is to be commissioned on CFHT during 2003.
REFERENCES Baliunas S., Henry G., Donahue R., Fekel F., Soon W., 1997, ApJ, 474, 119 Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Barman T., Allard F., Hauschildt P., 2003, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 402, 701 Barman T., Hauschildt P., Allard F., 2001, ApJ, 556, 885 Barnes S., 2001, ApJ, 561, 1095 Benz W., Mayor M., 1984, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 138, 183 Bodenheimer P., Lin D., Mardling R., 2001, ApJ, 548, 466 Brown T., Charbonneau D., Gilliland R., Noyes R., Burrows A., 2001, ApJ, 552, 699 Burrows A., Marley M., Hubbard W., Sudarsky D., Guillot T., 1997, ApJ, 491, 856 Burrows A., Guillot T., Hubbard W., M. M., Saumon D., Lunine J., Sudarsky D., 2000, ApJ, 534, 97 Burrows A., Sudarsky D., Hubbard W., 2003, ApJ, In press : astro-ph/0305277 Butler P., Marcy G., Williams E., Hauser H., Shirts P., 1997, ApJ, 474, 115 Charbonneau C., Noyes D., Jha S., Vogt S., 1999, ApJ, 522, 145 Charbonneau D., Brown T., Latham D., Mayor M., 2000, ApJ, 529, 45 c 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000
Cho J., Menou K., Hansen B., Seager S., 2003, ApJ, 587, 117 Cody A., Sasselov D., 2002, ApJ, 569, 451 Collier Cameron A., Horne K., Penny A., James D., 1999, Nat, 402, 751 Collier Cameron A., Horne K., Penny A., Leigh C., 2002, MNRAS, 330, 187 Fuhrmann K., Pfeiffer J., Bernkopf J., 1997, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 326, 1081 Fuhrmann K., Pfeiffer J., Bernkopf J., 1998, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 336, 942 Gonzalez G., Laws C., 2000, AJ, 119, 390 Gonzalez G., Laws C., Tyagi S., Reddy B., 2001, AJ, 121, 432 Gonzalez G., 1998, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 334, 221 Goukenleuque C., Bezard B., Lellouch E., 1999, DPS (AAS) Conf., 31, 0906G Gratton R., Focardi P., Bandiera R., 1989, MNRAS, 237, 1085 Gray R., Napier M., Winkler L., 2001, AJ, 121, 2148 Gray D., 1992, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K Groot P., Piters A., van Paradijs J., 1996, A&AS, 118, 545 Guillot T., Showman P., 2002, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 385, 156 Guillot T., Burrows A., Hubbard W., Lunine J., Saumon D., 1996, ApJ, 459, 35 Guillot T., 1999, Sci, 286, 72 Henry G., Baliunas S., Donahue R., Fekel F., Soon W., 2000a, ApJ, 531, 415 Henry G., Marcy G., Butler P., Vogt S., 2000b, ApJ, 529, 41 Houk N., Smith-Moore M., 1988, MSS, C04, 0H Leigh C., Collier Cameron A., Horne K., Penny A., James D., 2003, MNRAS, MNRAS accepted, astro-ph/0308413 Marcy G., Butler P., Williams E., Bildsten L., Graham J., Ghez A., Jernigan G., 1997, ApJ, 481, 926 Marley M., Gelino C., Stephens D., 1999, ApJ, 513, 879 Mayor M., Queloz D., 1995, Nat, 378, 355 Mazeh T., Naef D., Torres G., Latham D., Mayor M., 2000, ApJ, 532, 55 Pollack J., Rages K., Baines K., Bergstrahl J., 1986, Icarus, 65, 442 Queloz D., Eggenberger A., Mayor M., Perrier C., Beuzit J., 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 359, 13 Seager S., Sasselov D., 1998, ApJ, 502, 157 Showman P., Guillot T., 2002, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 385, 166 Sudarsky D., Burrows A., Hubeny I., 2003, ApJ, 588, 1121 Sudarsky D., Burrows A., Pinto P., 2000, ApJ, 538, 885 Tinney C., Butler R., Marcy G., Jones H., Penny A., Vogt S., 2001, ApJ, 551, 507 Udry S., Mayor M., Naef D., Pepe F., Queloz D., Santos N., 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 356, 590