May 18, 2010 - anisotropy energy favors in-plane alignment of M11. .... ever, to form a ferroelectric single domain in the (001) ..... P.-L.Yang, D. Hao, and R. Ramesh, Nano Lett. ... 23 D. Lebeugle, D. Colson, A. Forget, M. Viret, A.M. Bataille.
vacancies can affect the polarization in a ferroelectric material. This should, in turn, influence ... nonvolatile memory storage devices . However, the direction of ...
equilibrium atomic volume and bulk modulus for Î´-Plutonium. Our calculated equilibrium atomic volume of 178.3 a.u.3 and bulk modulus of 24.9 GPa at the fully relativistic level of theory, i.e. spin-polarization and spin-orbit coupling included, are
of single wall semiconducting carbon nanotubes with high degrees (up to 25 %) of ... to-date on the evolution of this acceptor-like level with the degree of .... 11. see, e.g., N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics, Saunders College ..
Jul 9, 2014 - surface and sub-surface Sn sites has a magnetic ground state, and the ... good example of NM impurity is carbon, which has been ..... Tech- nol. 17, 367 (2002). 6 Wen-H. Xie, Ya-Q. Xu, Bang-Gui Liu, and D. G. Pettifor,. Phys.
Oct 13, 2014 - that of the bulk and in different layers below, magnetic moments show Friedel oscil- lations in agreement ... âCorresponding Author. Email:[email protected] (Biplab Ganguli), [email protected] (Abhijit Mookerjee). 1 ..
Oct 10, 2007 - of the Ti-O chemical bond covalency near the BaTiO3 and PbTiO3 (011) surface as compared to both the bulk and the (001) surface. PACS numbers: 68.35.bt, 68.35.Md, 68.47.Gh. I. INTRODUCTION. Thin films of ABO3 perovskite ferroelectrics
May 19, 2009 - 2Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity,. University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-5002. 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, ... tal data requires a thorough understanding of the surface, both the structural
Jul 3, 2009 - tive sites on the support surface. Truly, in this resultant geometry, Au relaxes to a bridge position on O1 and Ti1 that reflects the maximum interaction between the Au adsorbate and the surface. At this minimum energy po- sition O1âA
metastable due to the nonequilibrium growth mode. The resulting surface after annealing exhibited similar features to that of a thinner film, having a domain structure with (2Ã1) and. (1Ã2) reconstructions, but with fewer oxygen-vacancy-type defect
heterostructures and superlattices (SLs).1-7 For example, enhanced FE and dielectric properties could be ... inversion symmetry,11,12 resulting enhanced ferroelectric properties.7,13 Along with these experimental ... exist naturally due to the solubi
Jun 20, 2012 - data suggest that Co dopant in NaFe1âxCoxAs supplies extra charge carriers and ... mary change in electronic properties is induced by the.
We find an isotope effect on the band structure, which is different for different .... alone, which is larger than a magnetic (i.e. exchange J) interaction almost by.
Jun 20, 2012 - Similar to the case of â122â type iron pnictides, our data suggest that Co dopant in NaFe1âxCoxAs supplies extra charge carriers and shifts the Fermi level accordingly. In the x = 0.109 compound, the hole-like bands around the zo
Apr 25, 2005 - Panel A: half filling. Panel B: overdoped system with x = 0.2. Panel C: Detailed dispersion of the quasiparticle band of panel A for t = 0.5eV . Symbols represent the experimentally determined dispersion for Sr2CuO2Cl2 (squares , c
Jul 29, 2010 - Abstract. We use hybrid functionals and restricted self-consistent GW, state-of-the-art theoretical ap- proaches for ... appropriate impurities and tuning the film-deposition conditions . This opens the way to ... improve the descri
With ab initio calculations we found surface localisation of one orbital and hence a change in the Mn valency from four in the bulk to three at the sub-surface. Different surface or disordered interface induced localisation of the orbitals are consid
moving to lower energies, which is a clear signature of the shifting of the Fermi energy EF due to the gate induced doping of the Sb2Te3 film. Note in the tunneling experiment EF is at VB = 0 V, and therefore the change in doping is observed by the s
Modulation PR measurements were performed at room temperature using a semiconductor laser operating at the 532 nm wavelength and a nominal power of 20 mW, as a pump-beam source, and a 250 W halogen lamp coupled to a monochromator, as a probe-beam sou
Apr 28, 1996 - calculations and experiment, Feibelman and Hamann  proposed that in the experimental study the metal sur- face may be contaminated by ...
critical thickness. Yeong Jae Shin, Yoonkoo Kim, Sung-Jin Kang, Ho-Hyun Nahm, Pattukkannu Murugavel,. Jeong Rae Kim, Myung Rae Cho, Lingfei Wang, Sang Mo Yang, Jong-Gul Yoon, Jin-Seok. Chung, Miyoung Kim, Hua Zhou, Seo Hyoung Chang*, Tae Won Noh*. Y.
Receipt date: November 23th, 2015. PACS: 71.15.Dx, 71.20.Nr, 71.55. ... been focused on tin-doped In2O3 (indium tin oxide, ITO), for which a number of papers about structure, conduction and ... cm2Â·V-1Â·s-1 reported in thin films of ITO ) keeping
Jul 13, 2016 - Microwave kinetic inductance detectors (MKIDs) are superconducting thin-film, GHz resonators that are designed to also be optimal photon absorbers.1 Absorbed ...... Savini, G., Scott, D., Stanchfield, S., Tucker, C., Ullom, J. N., Unde
Polarization sensitive surface band structure of doped BaTiO3 (001) J. E. Rault,1 J. Dionot,1 C. Mathieu,1 V. Feyer,2, 3 C.M. Schneider,2 G. Geneste,4 and N. Barrett1, ∗ 1 CEA, DSM/IRAMIS/SPCSI, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France Peter Gr¨ unberg Institute (PGI-6), JARA-FIT, Research Center J¨ ulich, 52425 J¨ ulich, Germany 3 NanoESCA beamline, Sincrotrone Trieste, Area Science Park, 34149 Basovizza, Trieste, Italy 4 CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France
arXiv:1806.03739v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 10 Jun 2018
We present a spatial and wave-vector resolved study of the electronic structure of micron sized ferroelectric domains at the surface of a BaTiO3 (001) single crystal. The n-type doping of the BaTiO3 is controlled by in-situ vacuum and oxygen annealing, providing experimental evidence of a surface paraelectric-ferroelectric transition below a critical doping level. Real space imaging of photoemission threshold, core level and valence band spectra show contrast due to domain polarization. Reciprocal space imaging of the electronic structure using linearly polarized light provides unambiguous evidence for the presence of both in and out-of plane polarization with two and fourfold symmetry, respectively. The results agree well with first principles calculations. PACS numbers: 68.37.Xy, 71.15.Mb, 73.20.At, 77.80.Dj
At a surface or interface of a ferroelectric film the depolarizing field arising from uncompensated surface charges can reduce or even suppress ferroelectricity below a critical thickness.  Surface charge can be screened by a variety of mechanisms: intrinsic [2, 3], extrinsic [3, 4] or domain ordering. [5, 6] Domain ordering and surface atomic structural changes can combine within single domains. [7–9] These charge-driven modifications are likely to strongly influence the surface electronic structure. Understanding such changes is mandatory for effective integration of ferroelectric materials into oxide-based electronic devices.  Any useful device design requires in-depth knowledge of the electronic structure at the interface. For example, interface hybridization between filled d orbitals responsible for magnetization and empty d orbitals in the ferroelectric oxide  plays a crucial role in heterostructures showing magnetoelectric coupling.  However, studies of the surface properties have focused mainly on polarization, transport and related phenomena. [13, 14] The anomalous dynamical charge tensors associated with the atomic distortions are particularly high for the oxygen-cation bonding chains.  Measuring the dispersion relations throughout the valence band would therefore be extremely useful. Angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (ARPES) is the ideal technique for measuring the band structure. It is used to study the electronic structure of metallic oxides such as SrRuO3  and La1−x Srx MnO3  but rarely applied to insulating perovskite oxides , because of charging during photoemission. Even where a metallic state is expected at the interface between two band insulators such as LaAlO3 and SrTiO3 (STO), the substrate is often lightly doped.  Vacuum cleaved stoichiometric STO did allow ARPES measurements but this was due to the appearance of a metallic 2D Fermi surface. 
A ferroelectric should be an insulator otherwise the long-range Coulomb interactions are screened, suppressing the polarization but there is now evidence that perfect insulators are not necessary to support ferroelectricity. Ferroelectric distortion is predicted and observed in doped BaTiO3 (BTO) with a critical doping of 1.36 − 1.9×1021 e/cm3 for the disappearance of the FE state [21–24]. Changes in the unit cell volume induced by oxygen vacancies further reduce the critical doping.  Thus, within certain limits, a material can have metallic character while stabilizing a ferroelectric state. This opens the way to full characterization of the electronic and chemical structure using photoemission-based experimental techniques. Micron-scale ferroelectric domain recognition of lightly doped ferroelectric samples can be performed using energy filtered photoelectron emission microscopy (PEEM).  PEEM demonstrated the existence of domains in BTO above the Curie temperature due to anionic surface relaxation.  In this letter we use synchrotron radiation-induced PEEM with linearly polarized light to study the surface band structure of micron sized ferroelectric domains in doped BTO(001). We provide evidence of a surface paraelectric-ferroelectric transition with decreasing metallicity. The microscopic band structure identifies domain polarization parallel and perpendicular to the surface and is compared with first principles Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. In the tetragonal (P4mm) phase of BTO there are two possible FE distortions along the c-axis, parallel and antiparallel to . The polarization may also be along one of the four equivalent in-plane directions, identified as Pin . Out-of-plane polarization gives fixed positive or negative surface charge, whereas no net surface charge is
UHV 700°C O2 695°C
(b) Ti 2p Ba 4p
Intensity (arb. units)
Intensity (arb. units)
(x 10) Ti
400 300 200 100 Binding Energy (eV)
FIG. 1. XPS survey spectra of BTO(001) after (a) annealing in UHV at 700 ◦ C and (b) annealing in 6 × 10−6 mbar of oxygen at 700 ◦ C . The insets show the corresponding LEED (left) and PEEM (right) images. The PEEM field of view is 65µm.
expected for Pin . The experiments were done with the NanoESCA photoemission spectrometer at the Elettra synchrotron. [27, 28] The stoichiometric BTO(001) single crystal sample (from SurfaceNet GmbH) was ozone cleaned ex-situ for 10 minutes immediately before introduction into the ultra-high vacuum (UHV) system.  The base pressure was better than 2×10−8 Pa. In the reciprocal space imaging mode [27, 30], which we call k-PEEM, the photoelectrons are detected with a wave vector resolution of −1 about 0.05 ˚ A for all kparallel and an energy resolution of 200 meV. The surface was prepared by 3 cycles of low energy Ar ion sputtering (500 eV) and annealing (650◦ C) in UHV. The final annealing step was done at 700◦ C for 30 minutes creating a clean, ordered surface with oxygen vacancies. [31, 32] Then the sample was annealed at 695◦ C for 2 hours in an oxygen partial pressure of 6 × 10−6 mbar to partially recover the oxygen stoichiometry. Figure 1 shows the XPS survey acquired using a photon energy of 650 eV after UHV (red, upper curve) and oxygen (blue, lower curve) annealing. They are similar and free of carbon. The insets show the low energy electron diffraction (LEED) patterns; in both cases we observe sharp (1×1) patterns. However, the threshold PEEM images in the right hand insets are very different. After UHV annealing no contrast is observed, whereas after oxygen annealing typical ordered stripe domains appear oriented parallel to  or , providing evidence for an uniaxial in-plane strain. [25, 26] The contrast results from the different surface charge as a function of domain polarization. The Ti 2p core level and valence band spectra using photon energies of 650 and 50 eV, respectively, are shown
460 9 6 3 Binding Energy (eV)
FIG. 2. High resolution Ti 2p core level (left) and valence band (right) spectra after UHV annealing (top) and annealing in oxygen (bottom).
in Fig. 2. The low binding energy Ti 2p component (black) is associated with Ti3+ ions, correlated to the appearance of states in the band gap, approximately 1 eV below the Fermi level shown on the right hand side of Fig. 2. From the relative intensities of the Ti4+ and Ti3+ we estimate that the free carrier doping after annealing in UHV is 0.2 electrons per unit cell. This decreases to 0.09 e/u.c. after oxygen annealing. The first figure is higher than the predicted critical doping for ferroelectric displacements [23, 24] and explains the absence of domain contast in PEEM after UHV annealing. After oxygen annealing, the doping is lower than the critical value and ferroelectric stability is recovered, evidenced by the appearance of stripe domain contrast in the PEEM images. XPS measurements  at 900 eV (more bulk sensitive) confirm that the vacancy concentration is constant over the first few nanometers. The O 1s and Ba 4d spectra are identical for both photon energies , showing that no phase separation or surface segregation has taken place. Therefore, the main result of UHV and oxygen annealing is to modify the doping level. Based on this result and in the following analysis we suggest that the main effect of UHV annealing is to increase the oxygen vacancy concentration and thus the electron doping, creating a more metallic-like surface. The oxygen desorption energy is much lower at the surface than in the bulk . Conversely, oxygen annealing reduces the electron doping allowing the surface to support the ferroelectric state. The upper inset of Fig. 3 shows a typical PEEM image of another region of the same sample surface after oxygen annealing. The triple contrast indicates the presence of P± and Pin polarization states. Regions of interest (ROIs), marked A and B, are selected corresponding to 10µm broad stripes. Both contain fine structure, de-
3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5
1A 2A 2B 3B 3.1
Intensity (arb. units)
3 2 1
Intensity (arb. units)
BZ (arb. units)
ROI A ROI B
3.3 3.4 E-EF (eV)
FIG. 3. Local spectra extracted from rectangles 1A, 2A, 2B and 3B in upper image. Typical threshold PEEM image (upper inset) after annealing in oxygen with two main ROIs, A and B, each with finer domain structure. Threshold map (lower inset) constructed from a pixel by pixel error function fit to the image series in the full field of view. Main threshold values in A are 3.29 and 3.32 eV, in B 3.32 and 3.36 eV.
fined by the rectangles 1A, 2A, 2B and 3B, indicating a high degree of sub-micron domain ordering. The local threshold spectra from this fine structure have different photoemission thresholds. The two lower energy spectra (1A and 2A) are in ROI A whereas ROI B contains the two higher energy spectra (2B and 3B). 2A and 2B are virtually identical, suggesting they are due to the same polarization. From consideration of surface charge they must be associated with Pin . The lower inset of Fig. 3 is the threshold map generated from a pixel by pixel error function fit  across the entire field of view of the image series. Three distinct values are obtained, 3.29, 3.32 and 3.36 eV with a standard deviation of 14 meV.  The intermediate value (3.32 eV), represented by the lighter (yellow) regions, is present in both ROIs. In ROI A the two low threshold values (color coded green and yellow) are dominant but there is a small proportion of high threshold values (color code brown). Thus in ROI A there are indeed three polarizations, P+ , P− and Pin , but the proportion of P− is much higher than P+ . The opposite is true of ROI B. Using an iris aperture of approximately 5 µm diameter we have carried out micro-XPS in the ROIs A and B. The valence band and (inset) Ti 2p core level spectra are presented in Fig. 4. The micro-spectra extracted from ROIs A and B reflect the average of the in-plane and out-of-plane polarization in each zone resulting in their small relative shift (50 meV). The vertical dotted lines indicate the positions of the constant energy cuts in the band structure presented in Fig. 5. Interestingly, the oxygen vacancy concentration, as deduced from the
468 464 460 456 Binding energy (eV)
6 4 2 Binding energy (eV)
FIG. 4. Micro-spectra obtained by placing a 5 µm iris in an intermediate image plane to select ROIs A (green downwards triangles) and B (brown, upwards triangles). Main figure shows the valence band spectra, the inset the Ti 2p spectra. For clarity only 1 out of 5 (4) experimental points are shown for the valence band (Ti 2p) spectrum. The vertical dotted lines indicate the positions of the constant energy cuts in the experimental band structure in Fig. 5.
Ti3+ component, is 13% higher in ROI A (green, lower curve) corresponding to an effective doping of 0.1 e/u.c. than in ROI B (0.08 e/u.c.), suggesting a polarization dependence of the oxygen vacancy concentration.  In comparison, DFT-based calculations in the presence of oxygen vacancies predict a critical electron density of 0.06 e/u.c.  Our evaluation of the doping level is based on the assumption that the Ti4+ state is reduced to Ti3+ but it is unlikely that a simple charge transfer model is sufficient to describe the electron density changes. The carriers released by the defect (i) may remain slightly bonded in the form of a polaron and (ii) keep a rather localized character due to the correlated nature of the Ti 3d orbital.  However, the general trend and the presence of a paraelectric-ferroelectric structural transition in a metallic-like state agree with the theoretical predictions. We used linear dichroism in photoemission to investigate further the ferroelectric state in both ROIs. Linear dichroism in photoelectron spectroscopy  can be used to study both orbital  and structural symmetry . It should therefore be sensitive to orthogonal FE polarization directions. The geometry is shown in the schematic in Fig. 5. The soft X-rays (50 eV) are incident at 25◦ with respect to the surface. The k-PEEM data are acquired from 1 eV above to 9 eV below the Fermi level in 50 meV steps (9 seconds per image). The resulting 2nd derivative data stack I(E, kx , ky ) gives the full 2D band dispersion parallel to the surface. We have used vertically (VP) and horizontally (HP) polarized light. For VP the light polarization on the sample is 60% p-polarized, with 40% s-polarized along . For HP, the light is 100% spolarized along . From the dipole matrix elements
4.2 eV BE = 5.0 eV
4.2 eV BE = 5.0 eV
FIG. 5. Top: schematic of the experimental geometry showing the direction of the linearly polarized light with respect to the crystallographic orientation. Main: constant energy cuts in the 1st Brillouin zone at 4.2 (upper) and 5.0 eV (lower) of the k-PEEM data from ROI A (B is similar ) using (a) VP and (b) HP light. The right hand panels show the theoretical calculations described below.  is perpendicular to the paper and  is horizontal.
we would expect p-polarized light to be sensitive to distortions perpendicular to the surface plane, i.e. parallel or antiparallel to  whereas s-polarized light should be sensitive to in-plane distortions. The s-polarized light should also enhance the emission intensity from the d orbitals.  The photon energy is such that kperp is at a Γ point (kperp = 2π/a (0,0,2)).  Figure 5 shows constant energy cuts in the 1st Brillouin zone at 4.2 (upper) and 5.0 eV (lower) of the k-PEEM data from ROI A (B is similar ) using (a) VP and (b) HP light. The right hand panels show the theoretical calculations described below. There are important differences between VP and HP light. The band structure using VP light always has fourfold symmetry whereas for HP the symmetry is twofold. The fourfold symmetry with VP confirms the presence of out-of-plane polarization. Apart from the opposite surface charge the dispersion relations should be similar for both P+ and P− . The HP cuts show that there is preferential in-plane polarization, parallel and antiparallel to , rather than in all four Pin directions. One would also expect evidence of twofold symmetry in the band structure using VP light. However, the 40% s-polarization is orthogonal to that in HP, pointing to negligible in-plane tetragonal distortion along . This is strong evidence that the in-plane polarization are mainly along  and [−100]. With reference to the PEEM images in Fig. 1 and Fig. 3, the domains in the as-received sample have grown
along  or  and not, for example, along  as observed by Schilling et al. This must be due to elastic energy, however, in our experiment we do not have sufficient control of the strain imposed by the sample holder in order to make a quantitative correlation. Density-functional calculations for in and out-of-plane polarizations in BTO were performed using the SIESTA code [41, 42]. We use the local density approximation (LDA), Troullier-Martins pseudo-potentials and a basis of numerical atomic orbitals, extended up to triple ζ for Ti 3d and 4s, and O 2p. The real space grid is determined by a 400 Ryd cut-off and the range of atomic orbitals by a 0.001 Ryd energy shift. Nine-layer, (001)-oriented slabs with TiO2 terminations are used. The geometry is relaxed using a conjugate-gradient algorithm until all the Cartesian components of the atomic forces are less than 0.04 eV/˚ A. Two configurations are considered: (i) an inplane polarization (a = 3.94 ˚ A) and (ii) an out-of-plane polarization (a = 3.995 ˚ A), stabilized by superimposing an external electric field (Eext =1.2 V/˚ A) perpendicular to the surface. This is necessary to screen the depolarizing field and is associated to a saw-tooth electrostatic potential with a discontinuity in the middle of the vacuum layer (20 ˚ A) to preserve the periodicity of the potential. A (1×1) surface unit cell was assumed, as observed in LEED. A 6×6×1 sampling of the Brillouin Zone was used, refined up to 20×20×1 to accurately compute the band structure in the relaxed geometry. The LDA results are shown as insets in Fig. 5. To compare with experiment they have been Gaussian broadened by 0.3 eV. It should also be borne in mind that any comparison between DFT based band structure and experiment is limited since we measure a spectral function which can show significant differences with respect to the calculated Kohn-Sham band structure [43, 44]. Within these limits we see that the agreement is rather good, the symmetry and the main band structures are reproduced. It is remarkable that despite the low contrast in real space PEEM, reciprocal space imaging is capable of identifying the surface polarization present in both zones, providing additional evidence for the ferroelectric state below critical doping.  Direct imaging of the band structure from domains using standard ARPES is impossible because of the beam size. One exciting application of the method presented here is the quantification of the dispersion relations at the surface of thin films with a view to identifying bands which may hybridize with a magnetic overlayer and give rise to magneto-electric coupling. In summary, using a combination of in-situ UHV and oxygen annealing we can control the surface doping of BaTiO3 (001) and the paraelectric-ferroelectric transition. For doping levels below the critical value, ferroelectric stability leads to domain formation with in and out-of plane polarizations reflected in the band structure symmetry. The results compare well with first principles
5 calculations and represent a breakthrough in the study of the electronic structure of ferroelectric surfaces. The unambiguous observation of domain ordering means that the link between band structure and polarization could be generalized to undoped ferroelectric systems. J.R. and J. D. are funded by CEA Ph.D. grants. We acknowledge Elettra for provision of synchrotron radiation facilities.
    
  
      
Correspondence should be addressed to [email protected] J. Junquera and P. Ghosez, Nature 422, 506 (2003). Y. Mi, G. Geneste, J. E. Rault, C. Mathieu, A. Pancotti, and N. Barrett, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 24, 275901 (2012). D. D. Fong et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 127601 (2006). R. Wang, D. Fong, F. Jiang, M. Highland, P. Fuoss, C. Thompson, A. Kolpak, J. Eastman, S. Streiffer, A. Rappe, and G. Stephenson, Physical Review Letters 102, 047601 (2009). T. Shimada, S. Tomoda, and T. Kitamura, Physical Review B 81, 144116 (2010). R. G. P. McQuaid, L. J. McGilly, P. Sharma, A. Gruverman, and J. M. Gregg, Nature communications 2, 404 (2011). B. Meyer and D. Vanderbilt, Physical Review B 63, 205426 (2001). M.-Q. Cai, Y.-J. Zhang, Z. Yin, and M.-S. Zhang, Physical Review B 72, 075406 (2005). A. Pancotti, J. Wang, P. Chen, L. Tortech, C.-m. Teodorescu, E. Frantzeskakis, and N. Barrett, Physical Review B 87, 184116 (2013). M. Dawber, K. M. Rabe, and J. F. Scott, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1083 (2005). C.-G. Duan, S. Jaswal, and E. Tsymbal, Physical Review Letters 97, 047201 (2006). R. Ramesh and N. A. Spaldin, Nature Materials 6, 21 (2007). A. Gruverman, B. J. Rodriguez, R. J. Nemanich, and A. I. Kingon, Journal of Applied Physics 92, 2734 (2002). S. Kalinin and D. Bonnell, Physical Review B 63, 125411 (2001). P. Ghosez, J. Michenaud, and X. Gonze, Physical Review B 58, 6224 (1998). D. E. Shai, C. Adamo, D. W. Shen, C. M. Brooks, J. W. Harter, E. J. Monkman, B. Burganov, D. G. Schlom, and K. M. Shen, Physical Review Letters 110, 087004 (2013). A. Chikamatsu, H. Wadati, H. Kumigashira, M. Oshima, A. Fujimori, M. Lippmaa, K. Ono, M. Kawasaki, and H. Koinuma, Physical Review B 76, 201103 (2007). P. D. C. King, R. H. He, T. Eknapakul, P. Buaphet, S.-K. Mo, Y. Kaneko, S. Harashima, Y. Hikita, M. S. Bahramy, C. Bell, Z. Hussain, Y. Tokura, Z.-X. Shen, H. Y. Hwang, F. Baumberger, and W. Meevasana, Physical Review Letters 108, 117602 (2012). W. Meevasana, P. D. C. King, R. H. He, S.-K. Mo, M. Hashimoto, A. Tamai, P. Songsiriritthigul, F. Baumberger, and Z.-X. Shen, Nature materials 10, 114 (2011). A. F. Santander-Syro, O. Copie, T. Kondo, F. Fortuna,
   
  
S. Pailh`es, R. Weht, X. G. Qiu, F. Bertran, A. Nicolaou, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, P. Le F`evre, G. Herranz, M. Bibes, N. Reyren, Y. Apertet, P. Lecoeur, A. Barth´el´emy, and M. J. Rozenberg, Nature 469, 189 (2011). W. Cochran, Advances in Physics 9, 387 (1960). J. Hwang, T. Kolodiazhnyi, J. Yang, and M. Couillard, Physical Review B 82, 214109 (2010). Y. Iwazaki, T. Suzuki, Y. Mizuno, and S. Tsuneyuki, Physical Review B 86, 214103 (2012). Y. Wang, X. Liu, J. D. Burton, S. S. Jaswal, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Physical Review Letters 109, 247601 (2012). N. Barrett, J. E. Rault, J. L. Wang, C. Mathieu, A. Locatelli, T. O. Mentes, M. A. Nino, S. Fusil, M. Bibes, A. Barthelemy, D. Sando, W. Ren, S. Prosandeev, L. Bellaiche, B. Vilquin, A. Petraru, I. P. Krug, and C. M. Schneider, Journal of Applied Physics 113, 187217 (2013). A. H¨ ofer, M. Fechner, K. Duncker, M. H¨ olzer, I. Mertig, and W. Widdra, Physical Review Letters 108, 087602 (2012). B. Kr¨ omker, M. Escher, D. Funnemann, D. Hartung, H. Engelhard, and J. Kirschner, The Review of scientific instruments 79, 053702 (2008). C. Schneider, C. Wiemann, M. Patt, V. Feyer, L. Plucinski, I. Krug, M. Escher, N. Weber, M. Merkel, O. Renault, and N. Barrett, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 185, 330 (2012). F. Amy, A. Wan, A. Kahn, F. J. Walker, and R. A. McKee, Journal of Applied Physics 96, 1601 (2004). C. Mathieu, N. Barrett, J. Rault, Y. Y. Mi, B. Zhang, W. A. de Heer, C. Berger, E. H. Conrad, and O. Renault, Phys. Rev. B 83, 235436 (2011). A. Hirata, A. Ando, K. Saiki, and A. Koma, Surface Science 310, 89 (1994). M. Kuwabara, H. Matsuda, and K. Hamamotot, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 1881 (1997). See Supplemental Material at [URL]. J. L. Wang, F. Gaillard, A. Pancotti, B. Gautier, G. Niu, B. Vilquin, V. Pillard, G. L. M. P. Rodrigues, and N. Barrett, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116, 21802 (2012). T. Shimada, T. Ueda, J. Wang, and T. Kitamura, Physical Review B 87, 174111 (2013). R. J. Smith, J. Anderson, and G. J. Lapeyre, Physical Review Letters 37, 1081 (1976). S. Ouardi, G. H. Fecher, X. Kozina, G. Stryganyuk, B. Balke, C. Felser, E. Ikenaga, T. Sugiyama, N. Kawamura, M. Suzuki, and K. Kobayashi, Physical Review Letters 107, 036402 (2011). N. Cherepkov and S. G., Europhysics Letters 24, 79 (1993). M. Takizawa, K. Maekawa, H. Wadati, T. Yoshida, A. Fujimori, H. Kumigashira, and M. Oshima, Physical Review B 79, 113103 (2009). A. Schilling, S. Prosandeev, R. G. P. McQuaid, L. Bellaiche, J. F. Scott, and J. M. Gregg, Physical Review B 84 (2011), 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.064110. P. Ordej´ on, E. Artacho, and J. Soler, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 53, R10441 (1996). M. Soler, E. Artacho, J. D. Gale, A. Garc, J. Junquera, P. Ordej, and S. Daniel, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter Condens. Matter 14, 2745 (2002). S. Chambers, T. Droubay, T. Kaspar, M. Gutowski, and M. van Schilfgaarde, Surface Science 554, 81 (2004).
6  A. Damascelli, Physica Scripta T109, 61 (2004).