in a fixed volume, because this quantity does not. *This work was ... 1. Existence of process that violates the baryon number. 2. CP Violation. 3. Departure from thermal equilibrium. The first requirement is obvious. If the Universe had no asymmetry
Oct 8, 2001 - line approach, but not the same, for example, the fundamental group of extra space manifold can be trivial in ... because there is no simple relation between the mass scales of extra dimensions and the masses of KK states .... Mathemati
Dec 11, 1995 - The precision LEP data has indicated a unification, with the help of supersymmetry, of the three coupling constants of the Standard Model at a scale of MGUT â¼ 1016 GeV, thus indicating the existence of a hierarchy between the Planck
The reps in brackets correspond to a full standard model generation, while the remaining reps are exotic. Thus the exotic fields include left- and right-handed fermions ... Ï(1, 3, Â¯3) + Ï(Â¯3, 1, 3) + Ï(3, Â¯3, 1). (2.6). â¡ ÏC + ÏL + ÏR ,.
contains a triplet but does not contain doublets, and 75 Higgs can connect the 50 Higgs to theÂ¯5 Higgs through the interaction 50Â·75Â·Â¯5. ...... (âbaI â âbbI ) ln (det MI ). + ân. (âan â âbn) ln (În)=0,. (3.23) ...... Because the te
is erased, since (B â L) = 0. However, recently it has been proposed a modified GUT baryogenesis mechanism which may produce the observed baryon ...
Aug 29, 2006 - factor, and its rank is lowered by (at least) one unit. .... GSM . Whereas direct breaking is allowed in the supersymmetric case, at least one intermediate symmetry group is needed for unification of the coupling constants ... tion, GG
Oct 17, 2007 - I would thank Andrew Cohen and Tony Gherghetta for useful ...  E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, D. H. Lyth, E. D. Stewart and D. Wands, Phys.
Jun 3, 1996 - FERMILABâPubâ96/133-A, SU-ITP-96-24 hep-ph/9606260. In models of slow-roll inflation [1,2], the universe is dominated by the potential energy density of a scalar field known as the inflaton. Inflation ends when the ki- netic energy
Apr 2, 2008 - In this paper, we discuss the idea of resurrecting GUT-baryogenesis  in a large class of SO(10) GUTs. Our analysis shows that fast lepton number violating but baryon number conserving processes can partially wash out the GUT- baryoge
C Sivaram. Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, 560 034, India. Telephone: +91-80-2553 0672; Fax: +91-80-2553 4043 e-mail: [email protected] Kenath Arun. Christ Junior College, Bangalore, 560 029, India. Telephone: +91-80-4012 9292; Fax: +
in cognitive functions, potential anxiogenic effects, depression-like behaviors, and altered activity levels, have been reported after ... The average size of AgNS (93 nm) and AgNC (84 nm) was found to be retained in ... Measures of alpha-diversity,
Family Problems. The problem of fermion flavours (or families) is one of the key problems in modern particle physics. It has different aspects, questioning origin .... and plausible solution being the solar Î½e oscillation into another neutrino Î½x (
Feb 28, 2007 - b Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China c Faculty ..... (31). â1 â¤ cosÏe â¡. 4Î±cu cos(âÏ + Ïd) â (3 + Îº)cd cosÏd. (1 â Îº)ce. â¤ 1. (32) where Îº â¡ Î±Ç«, r â¡ Î´â² Î´. ,. F(r,
Aug 20, 2012 - leaves a color sextet and weak triplet scalars light to the TeV scale. Consider now a scenario where a color sextet scalar field âucdc with the quantum num- bers (6, 1, 1/3) and a complex weak triplet scalar â(1, 3, 0) survive down
Convexity and set-valued functions revisited. Let I be an open interval. The convexity of a function f: I. ââ means that it holds tf(x)+(1-t)f(y)â¥f(tx+(1-t)y), for all x, yâI, tâ [0,1]. Recently, convexity has been the subject of intensive
Jul 13, 2015 - ... partitions; most recently, some problems on (what we call) colored ...... to Conjecture 12.2 the reader would benefit from consulting one of the ...
Oct 7, 2015 - Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanakro, Gwanak-Gu,. Seoul 08826 ... 2005-0093841) funded by the Korean Government. ... L. This SO(10) is a rank 5 group. Branching of 16 to the SM can be achieved via t
the mass which go like â(2n + 1)M2. C/(Ïg2. 5ãÎ£ã2). Modes with masses near or above the scale g2. 5ãÎ£ã2 become essentially degenerate with the ordinary KK tower, mn = nMC. We have not broken supersymmetry, and thus the gauginos correspon
Aug 15, 2016 - handed neutrinos wash out the lepton asymmetry before sphaleron processes can significantly wash out the original B + L asymmetry, and in this way one can prevent the total washout of the initial baryon asymmetry. We extend the origina
Mar 19, 2013 - zona 85287. E-mail address: [email protected] Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail address: ...
Jan 24, 2018 - arXiv:1801.08232v1 [math.AP] 24 Jan 2018. BÃ´cher theorems and applications. Congming Li1,2â. Zhigang Wu3. Hao Xu1. Abstract: In this paper, we establish BÃ´cher theorems for fractional super-harmonic functions, ...... Since the proo
Jan 24, 2013 - vectors of type (0, 1)), let H â TN be the subbundle whose complexification is. KâK and write J : HâH for the almost complex structure of H. Assume T (as usual, a nowhere vanishing real vector field) is such that dat maps. K to i
November 12, 2017. FERMILAB-Pub-01/223-T. EFI-01-33 hep-ph/0107268. Abstract. We construct a supersymmetric grand unified model in the framework of.
No-go theorems and GUT
arXiv:1207.3851v1 [hep-ph] 17 Jul 2012
Department of Physics and R-GIRO, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, 525-8577, Japan Abstract. We very briefly discuss the role of no-go theorems in constructing models of new physics beyond the SM. Keywords: PACS: 12.60.-i, 12.10.-g, 11.10.Kk
OPENING ADDRESS Good Morning everyone. We heartily welcome all participants. As you well know, we suffered from the Tohoku Earthquake just one year before, and lost twenty thousand precious lives. More than three hundred thousands peoples are still forced to live as refugees. We all share their pain and all will recover together with them as after World War II. We received many warm letters and offer of help from abroad at that time, which encouraged us very strongly. We express our sincere thanks here to every one. This workshop is the second one succeeding from GUT07 held at Ritsumeikan Univ. on December 15-17 2007. More than four years have passed since that time and many new facts were found during this time. There are signals of new physics beyond the Standard Model (SM): muon anomalous magnetic moments, top quark forward-backward asymmetry, Ubs etc. The presences of Dark Matter and Dark Energy have also been established. The recent LHC results have also had a great impacts.
NO-GO THEOREM IN MODEL BUILDING I have very short time and will comment on the prospect of GUT restricting myself only to the topic of the implications of No-Go theorems in GUT model building (Fig.1). The vertical line indicates the structure of quark-leptons of one generation, the horizontal line is for family one. • • •
No-go (1): Coleman-Mandula  theorem with Haag-Lopuzanski-Sohnius extension : The latter goes over the former by considering a rank one spinor charge, leading to supersymmetry. No-go (2): String theory does not allow for a high dimensional Higgs , which is connected with Heterotic string model and their perturbations. Non perturbative F theory or composite Higgs are out of this constraint. No-go (3): (a) U(1) symmetry is necessary for SUSY breaking. (b) If there is U(1) symmetry and it is spontaneously broken, then SUSY is automatically broken . Reflecting these results Fallbacher et al.  concluded that no MSSM model with either a ZRM≥3 or U(1) symmetry can be completed by a four dimensional GUT in the ultraviolet. This is a strong motivation to go to extra dimensions as a conceptual problem [? ]. No-go (4): This is concerned with no-go in family symmetry . This is less known unlike the other no-go theorems and is not established as no-go yet. Then we will explain it in the following
This theorem asserts that if one Higgs contributes in each quark sector and if the Yukawa coupling has a family symmetry, then we can not bring 3 × 3 mixing in CKM matrix. Let me explain in more detail. Under the above
Opening address given at GUT2012
conditions, the Yukawa coupling becomes (u)
WY = Yi j Qi Hu u j + Yi j Qi Hd d j ,
where Q is left-handed doublet, and u, d are right-handed singlets. Then the family symmetry, Q → Q′ = TL Q, u → u′ = TRu u, d → d ′ = TRd d.
TL†Y u TRu = Y u , TL†Y d TRd = Y d .
gives a constraint on Y u and Y d Eq.(3) leads us finally to 
d u eiδi − eiδ j Vi j = 0.
Here the SU(3) family transfomation is factorized as
f f f Pf = diag eiδ1 , eiδ2 , eiδ3
† TL = ULu Pu (ULu )† = ULd Pd ULd .
Eq. 4 shows that we can get only a two-family mixing, showing the inconsistency with observations. However, a model of many-Higgs in each sector seemed to evade this no-go theorem. In the framework of GUT, we have many Higgs doblets. For instance, the renormalizable minimal SO(10) GUT with 10 and 126 Higgs field have 4 Higgs doublets each in up-sector and down-sector , (1,2, 1 )
Here H, ∆, |Delta,Φ represent the elements from 10, 126, 126, 210, resectively. Also subscript (superscript) shows Pati-Salam (the SM) element. We can diagonalize the mass matrix, Mdoublet by a bi-unitary transformation. U ∗ Mdoublet V † = diag(0, M126 , M2 , M3 ).
Then the mass eigenstates are written as Hu , h1u , h2u , h3u Hd , h1d , h2d , h3d
Hu10 , ∆u , ∆u , Φu U T , Hd10 , ∆d , ∆d , Φd V T .
Here Hu , Hd are MSSM light Higgs doublets. However, these Higgs fields have no family quantum number and make any change in no-go theorem. As far as we do not break flavour symmetry explicitly, we are forced to impose family quantum numbers to Higgs fields. However, this implies that Yukawa coupling constant is not a constant but becomes a field. Let us consider, for instance, the case that SU(3)F and Q, u, d belong to 3-representation. Then SU(3)F invariance requires that Higgs fields is 3 or 6. However, we must construct tensor Yi j in terms of Higgs fields with family quantum numbers (flavons) φ i . Then the invariant Yukawa can be constructe by 3 as  WYa =
1 Q φ i u j φ j Ha , (a = u, d). Ma2 i a a
Alternatively we may consider a dimension five operator by 6 and 3 Higgs
φ i φ j → φ (i j) , ε i jk φk .
FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram of no-go theorems
Regardless too this, we must consider unrenormalizable terms, and gauge and family groups are still independent. Should we accept this as an intermediate developing stage ? If we include Higgs in matter multiplets, we can attach family index to Higgs like in some of E6 models , 27i = (Q, uc , d c , L, ν c , ec , Hu , Hd , g, gc , S)i .
However, family structure was considered from purely phenomenological approach. Thus GUT and family structures are left as independent ingredients. Lagrangian construction in nonlinear representation from higher gauge group is suggestive . Is family symmetry gauged but still independent on horizontal gauge symmetry  ? We hoped some no-go theorem in family symmetry which led us to some conceptual relations between these two ingredients. In this sence, we must still need no-go theorem in this area.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is grateful to all participants. He also thanks Koide for useful discussions. This work is partly supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (No.020540282 and No. 21104004).
REFERENCES 1. S.Coleman and J.Mandula, Phys.Rev. 159, 1251 (1967). 2. R.Haag, J.Lopuzanski, and M.Sohnius, Nucl.Phys. B88, 257 (1975). 3. K.Dienes,Nucl.Phys.B488,141 (1997). 4. A.E.Nelson and N.Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B416, 46 (1994). 5. M.Fallbacher, M.Ratz, and P.K.S.Vaudrevange, Phys.Lett. B705, 503 (2011).[? ] T.Fukuyama, talk in this conference. 6. Y.Koide, Proceedings of GUT07 (AIP Conf.Proc. 1015 (2008) 80). 7. T.Fukuyama and N.Okada, JHEP 0211, 011 (2002) 011; T.Fukuyama et al., Eur.Phys.J. C42, 191 (2005). 8. S.F.King and G.G.Ross, Phys.Lett. B574, 239 (2003). 9. M.Matsuda and T.Matsuoka, Phys.Lett. B487, 104 (2000). 10. T.Kugo, talk in this conference. 11. R.N.Mohapatra, talk in this conference.